I challenge chess.com to a best of 7 match. Score is now 1-0

Very good points Rael. I want it to be understood that I am in no way attacking Erik, who has been a very graceful admin to this site and to Cheater_1. Banning him would not be a dumb move, but banning him because of recent events would. Sure, the chess community could do very well without this fool stirring things up and challenging chess.com to seven games (in a somewhat desperate and grudging matter I may add), but...

Actually there really isn't any good reason to keep him on. All I'm saying is don't ban him because he wants to play more vote chess games. Just deny him of those games and tell him to shove his homemade chess engine up his, uh, toilet.

Just as I thought. JUST AS I THOUGHT. Team chess.com eeked out a "win". Then THEY use an old ploy of MINE and refuse to ever play again. RETIRE AS THE CHAMP after one stinking game. I cant get angry at that, as I have done that many many times. However, Whether you goofs admit it or not, you have sunk to my level. You have PROVEN that you are no better than me and are content to escape by the skin of your teeth.

So many misguided fools here. One minute you all DESPISE using a program to AUGMENT your game, then when ERIK allows it to be used in a game vs. me, you all somehow MAGICALLY open up your closet and whip out the latest version of RYBKA (hypocrites), and then after you play a game and get your way, you do a 180 and go back to despising programs. Was the EDUCATIONAL value of the last vote chess game lost on all of you?

TO RAEL and all his ilk: if you hate me and what I do so much, how come you are always following me wherever I go? DONT VOTE if you hate the game. DONT post in my forum if you hate what I say. Stop doing your stupid little photoshop bits if you hate what I say. STOP IT! Go away.

Now, I can understand how you all might not possess the LOVE OF CHESS that I do. No one on this site loves the great game of chess more than I do. So I can understand that a 7 game match series might tax your brains too much. Best of 5? Best of 3?  More likely a best of 1.

I propose that AT THE VERY LEAST, chess.com have a VOTE to see if there will be more vote chess games. There were hundreds of votes per move in our game, I say open it up to the members to cast their vote to see if they even want to play another game with me. I will ACCEPT whatever the vote is.

But one thing is for sure, I AINT GOING ANYWHERE unless the DICTATOR makes me mysteriously disappear.

I don't like vote chess because too often the move I want to play doesn't get enough votes! :-(

Not enough people play the Caro-Kann and then I get stuck in the Sicilian, which I know nothing about.

by cheater_1

"Was the EDUCATIONAL value of the last vote chess game lost on all of you?"

YES.

He who shouts the loudest has the least to say

-Anonymous 

by cheater_1

"No one on this site loves the great game of chess more than I do."

You certainly have a bad way of showing it!

I would submit to you- that cheating at chess is not a way to show your love for chess or respect for the chess.com community.

I appreciate your sophomoric rhetoric but I am just not that into you. 

good luck to you in the future.

You know the old saying, if you don't like what's on the TV, turn the channel? Well, that applies to vote chess. You don't have to play if you don't like it.

 LISTEN UP AS I GIVE ALL YOU YOUNGSTERS A LESSON IN LIFE!!!!

Is this about jealousy? Why am I, a cheater, allowed to play the entire pool of chess.com? What makes me so important? That's it, isn't it? Well, the simple answer is for fun. Erik has an OBLIGATION to make this site enjoyable for all who come here. It's his DUTY as the owner of this site to make sure that people want to come here, and hopefully spend money for a membership and hopefully click the banner ads. The more people that come here, the better the site does.

Variety is the spice of life. If you're a satellite TV provider, the more channels you have, the better. If you never excelled in sports and hate watching sports of all kinds, and therefore decide that you're not gonna carry ESPN in your lineup, YOU ARE A FOOL! and will lose all your business to another provider. If you run a newspaper and decide that running ads for Liquor goes against your moral fiber, then you wil lose MILLIONS in ad revenue and are once again A FOOL ! NEVER EVER EVER EVER LET PERSONAL FEELINGS GET IN THE WAY OF BUSINESS. Anyone who does, FAILS. 100% time. Always! NO exceptions!

FACT: There were about 1000 people that tuned in to the vote chess game. Those are number that cannot be ignored. There was a lot about chess that was to be learned from that short game. Read the archives. Comedy and wit and knowledge was in every comment.

If SATAN himself materialized and wanted to play, only a MORON would turn him away. All the naysers who dont think I should  be granted a game are nothing more than the type of people who think that Harry Potter should be banned from schools because THEY think it encourages witchcraft. THey have their own agenda, and that agenda is JEALOUSY..plain and simple.

From a pure business standpoint, if I were the owner of this site, I'd have dozens of man vs machine games, dozens of handicap matches, dozens of EVERY type of game I could think of. You all are letting your emotions get in the way. You hate me, so I should be BANISHED. Can anyone say "Adolph Hitler"? Can anyone say "Nazi Germany"?

I just like the thought of playing 1000 people with a program that me and a few buddies concocted over many years. I was just happy to play. If you want to claim victory and call it a one game match, so be it. But how about another "non-title" game. For pure FUN?

.

None of the Chess.com team actually wants you around. Erik was kind enough to grant you the ONE AND ONLY chess.com vote game to prove how much of a fail you are.

There is nothing positive about your presence or your attitude. If you think that Erik et all is are going to let you have a permanent presence here, you're kidding yourself, you failful troll.

I think it's awfully cute to see this self-admitted misanthrophe falling head over heals to hold onto his little chess.com character. You poor man, holding on to the one thing that means something to you.

Ohhh, pity. You desperately need more vote games, don't you, just to keep going on. It's all that sustains you, right?

I feel your hidden pain, you pitiful "I-need-to-cheat-at-chess" loser. I cannot believe that you feel you're somehow special for using a computer.

News flash, we all can imput moves into a computer. Die in a fire, thanks. 

"He is also man.Don't be so angry on him.Yes he is provocative but what we can...we are diferents,you never know,how was his life.Maybe he had horrible life and now is angry on all world.I think he deserve rematch.Now he plays with white pieces and if he lose or draw chess.com will banned him if he won he stay on chess.com and continue with no sense posting.It should be fair for all."

 He is also man... yes, well, we all are, doesn't mean that we deserve to have a vote chess game in our honor because we'll use a computer.

He is provocative? I think we've jsut gotten used to him. He's a freaking loser troll, dude, no more deserving of a computer vote chess game than any of us. "He deserve rematch"???? Give me one good reason HE deserves anything other than contempt.

His posts have been trollish from the start. "It should be fair for all"... do you mean - any loser troll who wants a vote chess game should be given one? Go rethink your reasoning. 

 Oh Dal, please. look, if we wanted an educational computer game, Erik could run it himself.

But whatever, I'm tired of pointing out the obvious. Chess.com will ban him soon enough with or without my help, so who cares.

Unless, of course, everyone is like "Gosh, I love that arrogant, mysanthropic guy around, he's the highlight of my day..."

Good luck with that. I, for one, cannot wait to see the account closed icon over his face. And it will happen, trust me.

"NEVER EVER EVER EVER LET PERSONAL FEELINGS GET IN THE WAY OF BUSINESS. Anyone who does, FAILS. 100% time. Always! NO exceptions!"

... they might fail at business, but they might also succeed at something far more important.