I DARE you to tell me , that my game wasn't an absolute MASTER piece !

great game, but you seem to be a very questionable character to say the least.

It was alright.

JamesAgadir wrote:

You game wasn't an absolute masterpiece. You did a mistake about half way through and missed a load of mates. The game was still quite good

First of all I repeat again it was a BLITZ game, so it's normal not to play perfect chess.

Second of all I said it was master piece not a GRANDMASTER piece , get a grip

💪

A toast.

With the way your opponent played claiming this game is a masterpiece is about like hammering on a punching bag then claiming it was a masterful boxing match.

 It was not a master piece... the master piece will be you being terminated. 

Penfold77 wrote:

With the way your opponent played claiming this game is a masterpiece is about like hammering on a punching bag then claiming it was a masterful boxing match.

If the bag was made out of metal (much higher rated player) and I still manage to brake it with my punching power, then yes it was like a masterful boxing match

Everyone keep saying my opponent didn't play a good game !? What do you expect him in 10 mins blitz game? Do you want him to play like Magnus ? Oh wait maybe still not perfect game if he plays like Magnus , maybe you want him to play like Stokfish? Oh wait still not perfect? Maybe like Alpha zero?

People you are ridiculous! He played good solid game for his 22 hundred, he was winning at some point and I manage to turn the table and outplayed him ! Plain and simple

hahahaha. are you aiming to challenge Lyudmil for most unlikeable and deluded person in the forum?

Rating, in itself, means little. Especially online. Whatever you opponent's rating said, the fact is they played like a novice. For all you know it could be a shared account where one player plays like a 2500 and the other plays like a 500.

#31

First get to 1000 rating , then come back and teach everyone else.

Masterpiece is an overstatement. It would imply that it was done with masterly skill and maybe even in an almost artistic way. It was certainly a good game however I don't see any point in making 3 forum posts about a blitz game.

Good game for white, but black was just to passive...

 I am a good c-class player 1411 fide and rising, and I think your game is far above this. I am not good enough to judge but it looks like a masterpiece.  FM-level? You of course were lucky because your opponent did let alll your pawns roll too hard, but it takes skills to convert luck to victory.  Congratulations 

ESP-918, 

Congratulations on your underdog win. I can understand how your opponent must not have liked losing that game, but it is no reason to suspect you using an engine. Both sides made human-like moves, as engines generate lines that are a lot harder to "see" the idea - here the "ideas" even I could see after a little time of looking at the positions (I am rated quite lower than both players here, but of course if I could calculate this during blitz - I would be in the game). Despite what some people may say, harping over the word "masterpiece", for what it is worth - I enjoyed this game; thanks for posting it. Additionally, I loved seeing the opening that was played. I myself usually play the (Samisch) Bobotsov-Korchnoi Petrosian Variation against the King's Indian Defense, but playing f4 is a line that is like an aggressive brother to this setup; it was fun to watch  Once again congratulations on this victory.

I like the game, good attack.

#35

#36

#37

Well said, with an open mind. 👍

Fascinating how the only people with an open mind are those that agree with you.

Well sad, indeed.

gimme a bucket