So much jealousy around here omg , just just practice more and you will be there one day no need to say negative thing just coz
I DARE you to tell me , that my game wasn't an absolute MASTER piece !
Sort:
I'll try to post it...
Nice attack!
#43
OK ? ... this is not the game , completely different game.
Were you paying any attention to the tread ? Obviously not .
#43
If you having trouble following the thread , game we are all discussing here is in post #11
ESP-918 wrote:
#43
OK ? ... this is not the game , completely different game.
Were you paying any attention to the tread ? Obviously not .
This other game shows that your playquality is inconsistent , and your rating is below 2000 because of your worse games. This is promising. When the difference between best and worst games are huge , there are huge possibilities for improving. You have the talent. You are sniffing on FM-level and only need more consistensy and a lot of hard work to get there.
ESP-918 wrote:
So much jealousy around here omg , just just practice more and you will be there one day no need to say negative thing just coz
When you set the bar really high with your egotistical titles, we expect more out of your game.
If you'd led with "have a look at this game", I probably would've said, "Yeah, that's not a bad game". However, when you set the expectations of your game being a masterpiece, you're more likely to receive negative feedback, as the game fails to meet the expectations you yourself set up for it.
#47
Such a smart arse ain't you?
When you set the bar really high with your egotistical titles, we expect more out of your game.
What exactly do you want to see more? Do you want me to make EVERY single move as an engine recommends ? With 100% accuracy ? And after that you will still not be satisfied?
I outplayed much higher rated player with style 8 good combinations, good tactics and all that in a blitz game .
I gave public what they want it to SHARP, AGRESSIVE,ATTACKING,RISKY, game and that's not enough for you ??? Take a walk buddy and breathe some fresh air !
Out of loosing position I manags to convert the game I to the winning one,by moving so precise.
Again, I never said it wasn't a good game. 16 Nxh7! was a nice move - but not exactly risky. You're getting two pawns for the piece in addition to a winning attack...and that was essentially it. I'm not sure where you're getting these "8 good combinations" from - you took the centre, developed your pieces and cashed in on the Kingside. I would describe this more as a "smooth" win than an "attacking, risky, masterpiece".
By the way, you were never "losing" as you claim; at worst you were very briefly slightly worse.
#50
Hence your fabulous centipawn loss. Which is better than some GMs.
Thank you thank you thank finally someone rally appreciates my art, my masterpiece.
Did you hear that #49 .? I repeat again especially for you " fabulous centipawn loss" .!!!
I mean how can it not be a masterpiece if so many players can't even believe a human were playing this game and not a machine ! How this is not a masterpiece I'm asking you !?
If you think beauty and art comes down to a number generated by a machine, I don't know what to tell you.
Feb 6, 2018
0
#52
m_n0 wrote:
Fascinating how the only people with an open mind are those that agree with you.
Well sad, indeed.
Award!
#55
I'm not impressed I'm sorry.
The game is no where a masterpiece, no where similar to my game . You ask me why? I can explain and give you 100 reasons why, but I won't give all the reasons for now I will give only one reason, after which you are already fail.
1 reason : your opponent is not more then 200 rating points higher then you . Simple is that, remember it's just one reason out of 100 , should I carry on?
Feb 6, 2018
0
#57
ESP-918 wrote:
#55
I'm not impressed I'm sorry.
The game is no where a masterpiece, no where similar to my game . You ask me why? I can explain and give you 100 reasons why, but I won't give all the reasons for now I will give only one reason, after which you are already fail.
1 reason : your opponent is not more then 200 rating points higher then you . Simple is that, remember it's just one reason out of 100 , should I carry on?
I'm impressed
#58
OK I looked at you game and again I'm not impressed at all.
Don't get me wrong it was a nice game and I see ratings their as well , BUT BUT for me it wasn't CHESS.
I can explain, winning a game full of blinders is not real chess it's just noobs battling each other.
For example if someone blunders a Queen and plays entire game without a queen and still wins it's NOT a masterpiece, it's just a nooby him and his opponent simple is that.
When you outplay someone positionaly or with some tactical or positional sacrifice, that would be a different story.
My game wasn't full of blunders I had 0 , which says of high level of play already, it had some inaccuracies, which is fine.17 centipawn loss as well , which is very high number .
jbent02 wrote:
His rating was provisional, he was no-where near 2200, maybe 1600
If his rating was provisional as you say how come he easily
beaten two random guys with a rating 2170+ ?
m_n0,
I am pretty sure "said" was intended, not "sad"