I am not as smart as Einstein, but neither did I have the training he had. However, he questioned theory a lot. I may be new here, but when I review my games, the engine tells me a better move let's say. Why move a bishop to where you will lose tempo from a mere pawn, especially if the pawn doesn't matter where it is at the moment?
Engines must think out the entire game, then tell you bad move, or it could have been better if you moved here. Maybe it's telling me I'm not playing the engine's game. Fine. I like to play my own games.
I do admit it could be considered correct at least half the time. I'll admit to missing a better move if it was better. I make mistakes and bad moves, too. AI has gone too far to tell me how to play my game. Too many times I must just respectfully disagree. Anyone else notice this?
It's a little hard to discuss in the abstract. Perhaps you could post several positions where you disagree with the engine.
I am not as smart as Einstein, but neither did I have the training he had. However, he questioned theory a lot. I may be new here, but when I review my games, the engine tells me a better move let's say. Why move a bishop to where you will lose tempo from a mere pawn, especially if the pawn doesn't matter where it is at the moment?
Engines must think out the entire game, then tell you bad move, or it could have been better if you moved here. Maybe it's telling me I'm not playing the engine's game. Fine. I like to play my own games.
I do admit it could be considered correct at least half the time. I'll admit to missing a better move if it was better. I make mistakes and bad moves, too. AI has gone too far to tell me how to play my game. Too many times I must just respectfully disagree. Anyone else notice this?