I loose my queen and my rooks and winning becomes difficult for me,why?

Those mates can be done, but they're difficult.  If you look at "computer workout" under the "learn" menu, you'll see some of those available to practice.

How do i do the UPS thingy?

If there was no hope for Anderssen (white), then probably the game would have ended much earlier, as the two players were chess masters at their era.

I have the complete diagram of the game for you below. The earlier puzzle might give you a biased view on how he played, but the reason why Kieseritzky lost was greedy play.

Black was way ahead in material, but he wanted more. Instead of defending his king, he rather ate both white's undeveloped rooks. 19. e5 blocks black's queen from defending her king, and black does not have enough resources to attack white king. Not to mention all other black's minor and major pieces are still undeveloped, on the contrary to white's active minor pieces and queen.

That it is not likely to happen if you blunder huge amounts of material.

Of course, there are some position where giving up material (sacrificing) gives a winning attack, but that's not the norm.

Next time try tightening your queen and rooks.

Indeed, if when a beginner you look at too many Morphy and Lasker games, you could easily be persuaded that getting rid of your queen for some lesser piece as soon as possible is a winning strategy.

lol

@Secretof Mana - Thanks for posting the entire game. It was well played by white. I wonder how early did white plan it? It was obvious he planned it by as early as move 18. (Bd6.)

Yes, that is the difference between her gaining material advantage with the exchanges and her moving a piece twice. It's not really that bad if you can't take advantage of it.

@secretofmana;thats a very tricky thing white did...i wish i can be that tricky at this my level of chess experience!

thanks suzana thats sweet!