Yeah, I should go back to hopscotch...
I suck at chess

"Why does every one (in particular people from India) seem to be keen on winning as soon as possible rather than having a good game?"
Because that's how people in your rating range play (and why they stay there)

Because internet is expensive there and they might get an electrical overload /power failure at any second.
so true


You're bad mainly because of simple carelessness. Same reason as most people. Sometimes you simply don't see things because you neglect to thoroughly assess and analyze the position.

I saw your games and you are just making beginner errors. If your attitude is to say you are bad at it and also insult people who are good at it and principles of the game I think you should take up a different hobby!

Choose an opening repertoire that leads to quiet, positional games. The King's Indian Attack, for example.

You're experiencing the "learning curve" that's the same for everyone. The only way to overcome it is to plow right through it with plenty of study and more games under your belt. Eventually you'll get sick of getting beat by the same old knight sac in the corner to win the exchange for the rook and learn how to prevent stepping into that trap. A bonus to that is once you learn some of these traps to avoid, you'll be able to recognize opportunities to use them for yourself. It's a game of patience. Try to enjoy the learning process and realize progress isn't short term, but the result of long hours of study and experience over years.
And it won't change. I cannot learn if the opponent uses one of the trap openings to get an advantage early in the game.
I don't think chess should be about remembering openings, positions and so on. If that'd be the case, one might as well let engines play against engines, because they are always better at remembering stuff than humans.
Chess should be about tactics and strategy. But there seems to be little place in nowaday's chess mind for this.
I can't be bothered to remember one hundred openings and their appropriate responses. I just want to develop my pieces without the fear of being trapped in an exchange where I come out one pawn less or where I find myself in a rook-king fork by the opponent knight. Or where I find bishop and queen simply threatening the c pawn, forcing an early check mate. Why does every one (in particular people from India) seem to be keen on winning as soon as possible rather than having a good game?
How can I learn end games if I never get into one? And just winning because the opponent blunders his queen away is dull as well.