importance


Honestly, this is a tough Q to answer for me! I always watch both of them and try to keep them up.. I agree with Azoth about ranking, it is definitely the most important to me!
but between rating and record, i guess rating is slightly more important to me..




Personally I used to play for record, but not to get the highest win ratio but to get a healthy win-loss ratio. I am aiming for 40% wins 60% losses. Cause you enjoy your wins, but you learn from your losses.
However, when I started joining tournaments that became difficult to maintain. So now I play for average opponent.

Friends first of all....but to you real question...
Probaby rating over record, tho trashed it the other day by having to resign 17 games all of a sudden due to having to deal with something personal. That dropped me from 2310 to 1939, so I guess, maybe neither any more, at least for awhile. but yes, rating overall would rank first.


I would have to say record, because with a high record you get a high rating. And it makes you feel good to be undeafted. Like I have a great record of 24-4 but a pretty good rating of 1432.
rating or record, record for me won loss is the key,
we must be all we can be,
and loss is there for all to see.

emilyispsycho7 wrote: like wins and losses
Really, ii's how cute the opponent is. Looks are everything in Chess
Members of chess.com!! which is more important to you . . . . your record or your rating?