Inaccuracies arent always a bad thing?

Sort:
lonewolflopez
So, i have been analyzing lots of my games recently, and i see that in a few of my better games, it shows that although i havent blundered or made mistakes, i have inaccuracies. Are sacrifices considered inaccurate? Werent different variations of different openings at some point considered inaccurate?
Martin_Stahl

Inaccuracies are tied to engine evaluations. If the move you made had a slightly lower evaluation than the best move, is considered an inaccuracy. The magnitude of that difference depends on who is doing the evaluation or how it was configured for automated analysis.

lonewolflopez
As a definition i understand, but couldnt inaccuracies also be considered ideas? Certain openings i have studied (whether it be a book, video or chess.com) say that certain engines dont like some ideas and those ideas are what makes certain play possible, right? Some are even considered mistakes directly.