Is 1000 a good rating?


Last year was around 1200 without any serious strategy learning. Then I had a long pause, but a month ago I've got addicted again. But I've realized the competitors at that level are much harder this year. My rank have fallen to 900 (!!!). Now I've started to take lessons, to get the pace again, but I'm facing opponents with almost perfect games in this level. Like this:
https://www.chess.com/live/game/54945361181
Do I feel right, something has changed in the level of the competition?

Another game below 900.
https://www.chess.com/live/game/55009070013
I haven't felt pressure like this around 1200 a year ago.

1000 is a terrible rating. End of.
chess is a spectrum. there's always someone better and someone worse. I don't know if there's such a thing as a 'good' rating.

Ok Pieces of Sh**, listen up
100-700 New Guy
700-900 3 month experience
900-1000 A average player
1000-1200 Above average
1200-1400 Good player
1400-1800 Advanced players
1800-2000 Very advanced players
2000-2200 Experts
2200-2400 FM
2400-2500 IM
2500-2700 GM
2700+ SUPER GM( MAGNUS CARLSEN, HIKARU NAKAMURA ETC..)
At this point only 3100+ online is super gm level
and I’m definitely not lower fm level lmaooo
totally inaccurate

1000 is a terrible rating. End of.
1547 is a terrible rating. End of.
Nr

No. It's rubbish. 1k to 1.5 is beginner. 1.5k to 2K is strong club player. 2 to 2.5K you are interesting. 2.5k upwards you are a monstrosity.....
U 1200 is beginner...
1200 to 1500 is above average amateur.
1700 to 1900 is a strong club player.
2000 Elo beat +99% of ALL the players here.

The average rating on Lichess is close to 1500. The average rating here on chess.com is close to 1100. So if we assume that average players are about the same strength on both sites, then at that level Lichess ratings are inflated by about 400 points.
The problem is that this difference is not constant across different rating bands. 1000-strength players would be inflated by a different amount, and 2000-strength players by a still different amount.
or, there are a lot more players on Chess.com. It's only objectively inflation if the player-base is similar on size. Personal experience also doesn't matter when trying to ascertain whether the ratings on Lichess are inflated or not. But, like, I don't really know tbh, never actually ran the numbers lmao