Plus blitz chess is surprisingly good at learning how to make things complicated especially when losing
Specifically learning how to swindle which is underrated
Is 1100 considered a respectable and above average rating?
Sort:
Sep 15, 2024
0
#263
I hate blitz. its too hard. I prefer Rapid and bullet ( I reached 1400 in rapid finally lets goo)
Above average
I'm stuck on 1900+ on atomic chess tho any tips?
Sep 15, 2024
0
#268
#448 no, blitz determines blitz rating, but for fide and uscf classical is important, that random guys school isn’t anywhere near the definitive word on what ratings are important
Sep 15, 2024
0
#269
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
nope
Rapid is meaningless
That's also meaningful unlike your life
Sep 15, 2024
0
#270
What's your all's problem in daily chess?It's good.Just taking a bit more time for thinking and analysing a crime? seriously?Why?You all say it's easy to get rating in daily but the highest daily player is rated 26 or 2700 wheaeas in all other formats the highest is either very close to 3000 or more than 3000.
1100 is good! anyways a peroson's value is not based on their chess rating or anything they've done. A person's value is based innately off of the fact that they are created in the image of God.
All these questions have no sense. Here on chess.com we are dealing with highly distorted rating system. Read my topic here, at least last messages:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/checking-if-elo-system-is-oppressive-with-proofs
Sep 15, 2024
0
#275
RyanZ_MD wrote:
1100 and 1200 are above average, but definitely not respectable
At OTB tournaments, 1100 is the lowest rated player.
If you're not contented on your own rating then learn how to grind hard
Sep 16, 2024
0
#277
DemonIord wrote:
If you're not contented on your own rating then learn how to grind hard
I am
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
DemonIord wrote:
If you're not contented on your own rating then learn how to grind hard
I am
Tilt more grindmore untilt then tilt again(actually getting better is usually a cycle there's a lot of rating go up but also rating go down and tilt)
After that you become prince and pretend 2300s good enough when every other game u hang queens or something dumb
Sep 16, 2024
0
#279
FinnTheStuffedShark wrote:
1100 is good! anyways a peroson's value is not based on their chess rating or anything they've done. A person's value is based innately off of the fact that they are created in the image of God.
Thank you
Eh I don’t play blitz that much and I’m trying to focus more on rapid now
no one cares about Rapid chess
it won't make you better
All forms of chess make you better but especially, playing slowplay otb games seriously and then analysing them. But you can't play classical controls wellm if you can't blitz and it's also useful to be a good rapid player. As you get into time trouble in classical you have to vary from the kind of slowplay that's appropriate to games when each player has two and a half hours, to the kind of analysis used when each has 90 minutes, and then increase your speed in deliberate stages, but playing, say, the next 5 minutes ar rapid speed and then when you have three minutes left moving to blitz speed and maybe even bullet. Then you reach the time control, you're still in the game and, well, I used to go for a walk at that point, with my clock running, and come back and treat it as a fresh game, because mistakes can be more common just after a time control.
no
OK let's hear your criticisms. OK, I know this thread is just trash talking but see if you can rise to the challenge!
look you can believe what you want to believe. you are free to do that
however, reality is I'm a 2300 level player & you're 1600 blitz. that means that I know a lot more about blitz than you do.
Rapid doesn't make players better at chess
I just looked at your latest blitz game which you won, against Timetocrush. It told me enough to know that you are neither a good tactician, nor someone who has a good grasp of strategic princinples. Your opponent went wrong pretty obviously.
I think you are confusing speed of play with skill. I've played 5 mins chess at a genuine FIDE 2300 level in my time. I was very good. What I've seen tells me you are not of that standard. That was some time in the mid 1990s, whish I was still in my mid 40s.
Half of blitz is time management unless your good at making opponents blunder
That's partly true. The way I play classical chess is to make games complex if i can and create threats on both sides of the board. Try to set up situations where they will blunder.
However, in 5 mins blitz, there isn't much time to "manage" so I suppose you mean "move as fast as you can". I rarely think for longer than 30 seconds over a move in a 5 min game. Try to keep it to three seconds. A good player can plan a game in a 5/ +0 game. Maybe not in a 3 min game. I don't consider bullet to be chess, since I've proven (to myself) that making short moves produces wins. Shorter moves are faster moves, so you just play a classical opening and then do nothing very fast in bullet.
However, it's nonsense to claim that rapid doesn't make you a better player. Practice at all speeds, even bullet speeds, will help.
You actually need practice at all speeds anyway cause your gonna get into time trouble in classical you need to know when to think fast and slow