Is 1100 considered a respectable and above average rating?

Sort:
Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Even i have a classmate 14 years old who is higher rated than you.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

absolutely that guy is just too egotic.If he wanted to say that in his viewpoint its bad he could have just said for me its not very good.What was the need to write things like its terrible,i have a 5 year old neighbour better than you,chess is equal to intelligence etc.?

I dunno it's just flexing at this point

Casualy pretty decent they can beat most people ,competitively they have a lot they needed to do

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

And there are many many adults who are dying for a rating of 1000 in chess.

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Then I also doubt about your so called 5 year old neighbour

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

And there are many many adults who are dying for a rating of 1000 in chess.

Plenty of them are really good at other stuff to like ,English ,stats ,ect

If chess was the only thing you could get good at it maybe chess could be based off inteligence

But unfortunately theree are many things you can get good at so it doesn't mean anything about intelligence in the grand sceme of things

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

I dont know his account but he is 2300 and a CM

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

Then I also doubt about your so called 5 year old neighbour

I'm not sure if she's on chess.com but I'll ask her parents

If she is then I will ask her parents to let her crush all of you 1100 level players

Nah the 1100s have enough 2000+ friends already so they can get crushed on whenever they want to

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

I dont want to reach anywhere in life with chess.I know i cant.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

I dont know his account but he is 2300 and a CM

Oh good... let him know who I am and have him send me a challenge

3/0 blitz chess we can play 3 games & I will demonstrate that he is not better than I am

I guarantee it

Probably not just beating him in three games doesn't mean anything at all

I lost to a guy 7 0 once only to have a 25/23 win/loss ratio

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

oh my god this guy is overcaring about elo and chess.Go to chess.com or play otb and then eat your pieces.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

oh my god this guy is overcaring about elo and chess.Go to chess.com or play otb and then eat your pieces.

Lol eating your pieces is a good roast

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Thanks btw bigchessplayer is actually higher rater than that guy but he is very humble.Learrn being down to earth from him.

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Go to magnus and get schooled.

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

His name is Krithik Dhinakaran

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

Thanks btw bigchessplayer is actually higher rater than that guy but he is very humble.Learrn being down to earth from him.

I do not feel like playing him again technically he beat me one time but beating an opponent one time doesn't mean anything lol

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

You could have finished the entire thing by writing 1100 is not good in my viewpoint.Many have written like that.I just read through all of them.You are at extreme level.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
Prince_Skywalker wrote:

I don't think there is anything wrong with sending him a challenge or calling him out on chess.com

after all, its only friend competition in chess

It's how/why your doing that is the problem

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

Then he is another guy

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:

Then he is another guy

Didnt you say he was a cm ?

Avatar of ChessIsAGoodBoardGame

ok fine go play your chess and first eat the pieces and then the board