Is 2100 good?
2100 is good.
Asking "Am I good?" isn't so good, though.
In chess validation comes from results, not from opinions.
I recently got 2100 in all three time formats and I can safely say a few things. First of all, yes, we are better than majority of the people who play chess (even not making one move blunders on its own is enough to place you there imo). But amongst otb chess? 2100 cc is alright imo. It's like 17-1800 otb (Depends really, as some people are better or worse online), and 17-1800 is like class b, solid player but not an expert or anything. So tldr: 2100s are fairly solid players who are better than most casual chess players, but are definitely not immortal and around slightly above average for serious otb chess.
2100, in blitz is quite good, and people play better in online blitz then in person, because less distraction, the use of a mouse, etc, so yes not bad, but you need 600 more elo to put yourself were you wanna be imo.
Dungeon Master.
He probably meant PM, private message.
dude, if you are 2100, you are better than, like, 99.997 percent of the population. i can only dream of being as smart as you. 2100 is legendary!
My 2190 in blitz puts me above 99,9% of the blitz players in Chess.com, so it must be good. I am well above the average chess player here.