OTB = online - 1000??? Uh oh...
is 2200 a good rating?
Sort:
Aug 6, 2023
0
#24
I obviously would tend to have a positive opinion of UNICORNS 😍
This is an obvious parody post, but most importantly, this excellent rainbow equine is vouched for by our friend @GYG
Aug 6, 2023
0
#26
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
here is how chess.com makes people feel better about themselves by inflating the percentiles. ban people with high ratings. that is why it is stupidly easy to get 99% percentile on this site.
Bruh you are SOOO salty. Just cause you got banned for too many reports of verbal abuse, now you're making up stuff like diamond members only getting matched with other diamonds and random bans of high rated players for no reason. All just to enjoy pooping on the site that banned you. It'll only end up getting you banned again 🙄
Aug 6, 2023
0
#27
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive 写道:
i thought the site name was chess.com, yet you have 1300s playing chess like it's checkers. the funny thing is that somehow 1300 isn't even below average here.
why are you discriminating against people like me who play chess like it's checkers, can't we have fun wreaking utter havoc on the board? 
Aug 6, 2023
0
#28
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive 写道:
go ahead and check the stats of banned players, they have above average ratings on average.
WOOOOOOW REALLY NOW 😱 SHOCKING!!!
Aug 6, 2023
0
#29
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
Sporkled wrote:
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
here is how chess.com makes people feel better about themselves by inflating the percentiles. ban people with high ratings. that is why it is stupidly easy to get 99% percentile on this site.
Bruh you are SOOO salty. Just cause you got banned for too many reports of verbal abuse, now you're making up stuff like diamond members only getting matched with other diamonds and random bans of high rated players for no reason. All just to enjoy pooping on the site that banned you. It'll only end up getting you banned again 🙄
lmao chess.com already admits that they match diamond players with diamond players. also go ahead and check the stats of banned players, they have above average ratings on average.
Yeah of course they have above average ratings! You don't get banned for using an engine with a rating of 800 😂😂
Aug 6, 2023
0
#31
ice_cream_cake wrote:
sometimes you do with even lower of a rating
@phantommarker
Yikes, I wonder what they got banned for
Aug 6, 2023
0
#33
ehm42 wrote:
Ngl, percentiles are just slightly infalted, 1500 rapid is in the 97% percentile, but it's not as exaggerated as you say @MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive
It's just the huge number of casual, low rated players :/ if you really want to know where you stand, you have to take 200 points off your Elo and then find your percentile in the Fide rankings. Now that's an eye opener
Aug 6, 2023
0
#34
ehm42 wrote:
Sporkled wrote:
ice_cream_cake wrote:
sometimes you do with even lower of a rating
@phantommarker
Yikes, I wonder what they got banned for
The guy literally said in a thread he would use an engine when playing lol
Oof. Brb gotta go eat my words 🤢
Aug 6, 2023
0
#35
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
ehm42 wrote:
Ngl, percentiles are just slightly infalted, 1500 rapid is in the 97% percentile, but it's not as exaggerated as you say @MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive
1500 rapid at 97% percentile is extremely turbo inflated. i guess they want to make bad players feel like they're better than 97% of players.
I wonder how you feel about the inflation on lichess lmao
Aug 6, 2023
0
#36
Ehm you don't even play time controls over like 10 minutes why are you even worrying about it
Aug 6, 2023
0
#37
Sporkled 写道:
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
ehm42 wrote:
Ngl, percentiles are just slightly infalted, 1500 rapid is in the 97% percentile, but it's not as exaggerated as you say @MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive
1500 rapid at 97% percentile is extremely turbo inflated. i guess they want to make bad players feel like they're better than 97% of players.
I wonder how you feel about the inflation on lichess lmao
@AccountRemaker used to like to rant about how lichess players are stronger than cc players, if my memory serves
Aug 6, 2023
0
#39
@Sporkled doesn't play bullet and OP's bullet is probably too high if 2200 blitz. So. I guess that the remaining candidate is then @ehm42
not great not terrible
about 1523 USCF am i right
also, what is up with your blitz rating why haven't you sat down and spammed blitz games yet
not that i am saying i thought you should return, but i'm just wondering, yknow