yummy
is 2200 a good rating?
Sort:
Aug 9, 2023
0
#83
You're a known troll with multiple accounts closed for abuse... "they were false bans" isn't an interesting line to take.
Aug 9, 2023
0
#84
That's not a question, so use a period.
And regardless of what you are, it's your long-standing (and IMO well-earned) reputation.
its meh cause i even view my own rating as garbage as its more like reaching a new peak
If a higher rating is always your goal, you'll always feel dissatisfied ... Every new baseline you reach will only give you a temporary high. That short-lived spurt of dopamine. Then you'll be back to feeling unhappy with where you are.
It's cycle that generates progress, but at a cost.
If peace of mind is what you're after, try to focus on enjoying the chess itself, rather than the ratings gains.
Carlsen, for example, seems to have found a better place, once he stopped chasing titles, and stopped chasing 2900 ...
Aug 9, 2023
0
#88
When you're new you improve without even trying. So it's frustrating when you hit the inevitable roadblock.
It's much easier to be satisfied with where you are when forced by the reality that you can't improve anymore.
Aug 9, 2023
0
#89
ice_cream_cake написал:
no i don't think it's a very good rating because @Troll told me that my otb rating would be 700 if my online rating is 1700. so i think otb is online - 1000 points, putting you at 1200 i.e. class E player
Google: FIDE uses the ELO system.
Aug 9, 2023
0
#90
Badchesserrr 写道:
ice_cream_cake написал:
no i don't think it's a very good rating because @Troll told me that my otb rating would be 700 if my online rating is 1700. so i think otb is online - 1000 points, putting you at 1200 i.e. class E player
Google: FIDE uses the ELO system.
I guess it's sad that sarcasm doesn't work well online, but yeah, I definitely believe I will be a 900 otb.
Aug 9, 2023
0
#91
Sporkled wrote:
ehm42 wrote:
Ngl, percentiles are just slightly infalted, 1500 rapid is in the 97% percentile, but it's not as exaggerated as you say @MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive
It's just the huge number of casual, low rated players :/ if you really want to know where you stand, you have to take 200 points off your Elo and then find your percentile in the Fide rankings. Now that's an eye opener
30% for me. 1000-200=800, and 800 is 30th percentile. (i used uscf by accident)
Neon_Champion wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:
its meh cause i even view my own rating as garbage as its more like reaching a new peak
"Meh," may be an overstatement.
And you shouldn't view your ratings as trash, they are quite good.
you aren't even comparable to me what's viewed as "good" is only when you reach high and never look back. you have no right to tell me they are good; that's more like pity to me than anything so next time don't bother saying i am good when I am garbage you random person
Aug 9, 2023
0
#93
is calling someone good somehow a bad thing?
Idk, i guess i think one can state that someone is by their definition good while also acknowledge that that person wants to be higher and isn't satisfied where they're at
ice_cream_cake wrote:
acknowledge that that person wants to be higher and isn't satisfied where they're at
you can say i am decent but i ain't happy about my ratings and why should i? its not like I am a master cause then maybe i would even recommend my rating as a goal. for me i got nothing to be happy about unless i am titled cause the job is simply not done and it reflect nothing
ehm42 wrote:
So that's why lots of good players keep calling themselves garbage in threads.
I don't see why you'd always be dissatisfied. If I hit something like 2000, I'll be satisfied. i mean I'd still want to gain rating, but I wouldn't feel that it's a garbage rating
in the grand scheme of things 2000 is completely nothing but if your happy with attaining that milestone then enjoy it. 23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough. i will never be satisfied even if I reach 2600 one as that means nothing to me. i often find players who try to play beyond their expected skill interesting to look at as they take risks to improve but online you can be whatever you want as there is completely zero risk involved just making it a question of how long it will take to achieve
4200 is good.
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
yeah this site is a joke, 2000 blitz players here hang pieces like crazy
that reminds me of this game i played last night, its relative and quite confusing at any level
just free pawns instead of pieces everywhere
Aug 9, 2023
0
#98
Kowarenai написал:
MyRatingIs1523IsntAbusive wrote:
yeah this site is a joke, 2000 blitz players here hang pieces like crazy
that reminds me of this game i played last night, its relative and quite confusing at any level
just free pawns instead of pieces everywhere
AYO IS THAT THE PP PAWN STRUCTURE!?!?!?
Aug 9, 2023
0
#99
Kowarenai wrote:
23-2600 players are all around 2000 or mostly filled with players who are near the master pool but aren't good enough.
I mean... you're mostly talking about yourself right? Some titled players are 2100 on chess.com. I see in your game history one GM was 2400 blitz.
hiChào bạn