is chess a sport?

Sort:
Avatar of IsraeliGal
lfPatriotGames wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:

Right..

The point you're missing is that for an activity to be deemed a sport it needs to have a considerable amount of BOTH. 

 

 

I'm not sure the dictionary says that. I don't think it says "considerable". Some sports rely on the exertion part, but not so much on the skill part. Others are the opposite. High level of skill, but little exertion. How do you determine the threshold for each? I would say it's enough to simply say a sport requires at least some of each. 

Look, let me put it this way. 

in the olympics, activities like track and field, long jump, shot put, all require great physical exertion, but ALL of them ALSO, require physical skill. All of these sports athletes spend their entire lives learning the sport and train like hell for 4 years so that they can perform at the highest level.

Compare that with chess, where literally an old 50 year old man with a beer gut bigger than multiple massive watermelons combined, can sit in a chair, and move pieces around with his arm. 

If you don't want to use chess as an example, then use darts. An old man/woman can do it, while being completely unfit. This is not sport, this is a game. 

The definition states "And", not "or", it requires both Physical exertion AND, skill, as requirements for an activity to be deemed a sport. It's obvious from the definition this doesn't mean "a small amount of a certain one and a large amount of the other". 

In every single sport you can think of, Both physical skill and exertion are present in very large degrees. 

 

But if you can list a single sport where not both are completely present then I'd like to hear about it.

 

Avatar of Nennerb
icyboyyy wrote:

This argument is so stupid

Do you know the answer?

Avatar of Chestnut_22
Soniasthetics wrote:
Chestnut_22 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Chestnut_22 wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:

If you think hitting a ball with a stick slowly requires even mediocre physical exertion then you have genuinely no idea about these games. 

 

Cooking literally requires more physical exertion than snookers/billiards. It's not a sport.

 

 

 

Try telling that to professionals who have to keep bending over and striking the cue ball for hours in front of an audience they may not have to be in great physical shape to compete but it helps.

u literally debunked ur own argument for me.

 

I didn't debunk nothing lol cue sports were originally pub games played in a relaxed environment where participants drink and smoke they evolved into a sport when they started taking it seriously and broadcasting it worldwide.

So it's not a sport till it gets broadcasted to more viewers.

Either ur a bad troll, or ur very naive.

 

It's a fluid concept definitions change over time poker is broadcast on espn I still think it's a game but snooker is def a sport.

You sound like you need a game of boxing chess let off some steam.

Avatar of Gosha171

Yes

Avatar of MaxVelocity1

I agree that chess is indeed a game 

Avatar of anthonyaw

I think it is due to sports being fun, which is the same as chess there both fun so I consider chess as a sport.

Avatar of Nennerb
anthonyaw wrote:

I think it is due to sports being fun, which is the same as chess there both fun so I consider chess as a sport.

Some people think that throwing rocks over an overpass is fun too.

Avatar of anthonyaw

So, your point is blank, sport is anything that exercises your brain.

Avatar of anthonyaw

Additionally, the International Olympic Committee considers chess to be a sport.

Avatar of Nennerb

Exercising your brain and having fun don't mean the same thing. The SAT exercises your brain, but I doubt many people find it fun. What is your definition of sports? Please be specific.

Avatar of anthonyaw

Something that exercises your body and something that blows off steam, moves your heart. It is pretty obvious that you never went to school.

Avatar of anthonyaw

See I proved my point and shut you up

Avatar of Nennerb

"moves your heart" -- are we still talking about chess?

Avatar of Nennerb

The definition of sports that you supplied does not apply to chess. Chess does not exercise your body-- at most, it uses your brain and hands; however, that's not enough to say chess exercises the body. Most people don't play chess to blow off steam. If anything, playing chess when you're tired or stressed out will end up with you losing your games and rage quitting. By "moves your heart," I assume you mean physically rather than emotionally. Chess does not move your heart unless you consider anxiety. But with that consideration, you might as well say that haunted houses are a sport.

Avatar of IsraeliGal
anthonyaw wrote:

So, your point is blank, sport is anything that exercises your brain.

thats not sport. 

 

Avatar of MagicalScarecrow

depends on your definition of sport.

the dictionary definition is "an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment," which chess doesn't fit into

Avatar of NicCageCanChess

I say we take sides and then team brawl to the death. Last left standing wins.

Avatar of MagicalScarecrow

due to the physical exertion part (unless you count magnus raging when he loses)

Avatar of IsraeliGal

no it doesn't "depend" on your definition.

There is an actual definition, an activity that involves physical exertion and skill.

It's hilarious how thousands of years ago sport was considered activities like gladiators, and now a days we put chess in the sport category. 

 

Avatar of NicCageCanChess