This argument is so stupid
Do you know the answer?
If you think hitting a ball with a stick slowly requires even mediocre physical exertion then you have genuinely no idea about these games.
Cooking literally requires more physical exertion than snookers/billiards. It's not a sport.
Try telling that to professionals who have to keep bending over and striking the cue ball for hours in front of an audience they may not have to be in great physical shape to compete but it helps.
u literally debunked ur own argument for me.
I didn't debunk nothing lol cue sports were originally pub games played in a relaxed environment where participants drink and smoke they evolved into a sport when they started taking it seriously and broadcasting it worldwide.
So it's not a sport till it gets broadcasted to more viewers.
Either ur a bad troll, or ur very naive.
It's a fluid concept definitions change over time poker is broadcast on espn I still think it's a game but snooker is def a sport.
You sound like you need a game of boxing chess let off some steam.
I think it is due to sports being fun, which is the same as chess there both fun so I consider chess as a sport.
I think it is due to sports being fun, which is the same as chess there both fun so I consider chess as a sport.
Some people think that throwing rocks over an overpass is fun too.
Exercising your brain and having fun don't mean the same thing. The SAT exercises your brain, but I doubt many people find it fun. What is your definition of sports? Please be specific.
Something that exercises your body and something that blows off steam, moves your heart. It is pretty obvious that you never went to school.
The definition of sports that you supplied does not apply to chess. Chess does not exercise your body-- at most, it uses your brain and hands; however, that's not enough to say chess exercises the body. Most people don't play chess to blow off steam. If anything, playing chess when you're tired or stressed out will end up with you losing your games and rage quitting. By "moves your heart," I assume you mean physically rather than emotionally. Chess does not move your heart unless you consider anxiety. But with that consideration, you might as well say that haunted houses are a sport.
So, your point is blank, sport is anything that exercises your brain.
thats not sport.
depends on your definition of sport.
the dictionary definition is "an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment," which chess doesn't fit into
Right..
The point you're missing is that for an activity to be deemed a sport it needs to have a considerable amount of BOTH.
I'm not sure the dictionary says that. I don't think it says "considerable". Some sports rely on the exertion part, but not so much on the skill part. Others are the opposite. High level of skill, but little exertion. How do you determine the threshold for each? I would say it's enough to simply say a sport requires at least some of each.
Look, let me put it this way.
in the olympics, activities like track and field, long jump, shot put, all require great physical exertion, but ALL of them ALSO, require physical skill. All of these sports athletes spend their entire lives learning the sport and train like hell for 4 years so that they can perform at the highest level.
Compare that with chess, where literally an old 50 year old man with a beer gut bigger than multiple massive watermelons combined, can sit in a chair, and move pieces around with his arm.
If you don't want to use chess as an example, then use darts. An old man/woman can do it, while being completely unfit. This is not sport, this is a game.
The definition states "And", not "or", it requires both Physical exertion AND, skill, as requirements for an activity to be deemed a sport. It's obvious from the definition this doesn't mean "a small amount of a certain one and a large amount of the other".
In every single sport you can think of, Both physical skill and exertion are present in very large degrees.
But if you can list a single sport where not both are completely present then I'd like to hear about it.