Is chess anti feminist?
Sort:
Pulpofeira wrote:
Deadmanparty escribió:
If you cannot falsify a belief, then it is more like a religious belief. Not really one that others should be expected to agree with.
Some things can just be discussed. Not everything can be falsified in sociology like it was quantum physics. And I don't expect anyone to agree, and I'd never think myself it would be the only explanation, even if correct. Just adding a point of view, which I think is reasonable.
Stating that women are basically just like guys except genitalia is not really a belief that can be discussed. It is basically a belief you can agree with or say is wrong. No real room for discussion.
PapaWhiskey16 wrote:
No, it isn't meant to be offensive, but if women are going to be little snowflakes about it then the discussion shouldn't be brought up
Snowflakes = people that start whining anytime their privileges are threatened. Now who does that sound like?
Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
pierceklipple wrote:
Chess.com isn’t having peoples privileges be threatened
If you can't follow the discussion, you probably should refrain from posting on the topic.
Deadmanparty wrote:
Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
Nope. That's not privilege. Try again.
Feb 20, 2023
0
#137
btickler wrote:
pierceklipple wrote:
Chess.com isn’t having peoples privileges be threatened
If you can't follow the discussion, you probably should refrain from posting on the topic.
Can’t tell me what you
pierceklipple wrote:
Can’t tell me what you
This seems to encapsulate what you have to offer here nicely.
btickler wrote:
Deadmanparty wrote:
Privilege as in getting a title for a lower achievement because you are the right sex?
Nope. That's not privilege. Try again.
It is by definition privilege.
If you cannot falsify a belief, then it is more like a religious belief. Not really one that others should be expected to agree with.
Some things can just be discussed. Not everything can be falsified in sociology like it was quantum physics. And I don't expect anyone to agree, and I'd never think myself it would be the only explanation, even if correct. Just adding a point of view, which I think is reasonable.