Is chess anti feminist?

This is just an ridiculous argument, a silly ad hom, you are really bringing nothing to this discussion in good faith in any way, you just seem to be bitter and toxic, repeating the NPC mantra, the MKultra is really really working on you.

It's not an argument, Sherlock.  Why I would I reply to a non-argument with a cogent argument?  Now shoo, go try to get Andrew Tate of out prison or something...

--

Technically it is an argument, its a fallacy, its called Ad Hominem,  you are arguing that because someone thinks "smoking is cool" then their ideas or opinion must be wrong about something else, its a fallacy people should have learned in high school. Andrew Tate? what is wrong with you? You are obviously not a serious person. It's sad what has happened to you. I'm so sorry.

btickler wrote: Deadmanparty wrote: btickler wrote: Deadmanparty wrote:

Wealth is tied to families.  Families are made up of both men and women.  Your sexist world-view is just circular making you impossible to reason with.

Another failed claim at an absolute.  Wealth is demonstrably not tied only to families.  Really, you could do better.

To a true believer, anything that disagrees with their heart is a failed claim.

Obviously family wealth is shared by all members of the family.  Only in your world do only men benefit from wealth.

Another obvious and basic debate tactic, you sure are running the gamut of them here...but swapping "wealth" for the now qualified "family wealth" is just you conceding my point.

----

So then you are arguing that women do not benefit from wealth accumulated by their families? Do you have a point to make? or just more toxic parroting of Whoopi's crib notes from the View?

How would you know what "has happened to me", when your account is 36 minutes old?

I give your input as much value as I give any other sockpuppet's...that is, none at all.  Man up.

women are cool

Nope, that does not follow and was never stated.  You guys *really* need to learn how logic works.  If you can't even make a single point without making up an argument in your head, then you will never argue your way out of a paper bag.

No, it isn't meant to be offensive, but if women are going to be little snowflakes about it then the discussion shouldn't be brought up

Snowflakes = people that start whining anytime their privileges are threatened.  Now who does that sound like?

--

This is not where "snowflake" originated, it was used to describe the weak and ideologically possessed undergrads in western colleges that demand "safe spaces", which denotes a "space" free from ideas that they cannot debate because their worldview has indefensible components. They are called snowflakes because they choose to try and marginalize and silence instead of learning to debate and defend their ideas with real arguments.

Females, statistically, are not that interested in chess.

To increase participation and FIDE enrollment, female-specific titles (and female-specific events) are offered as incentives.

It's not about ability - it's about trying to attract more female players to the game.

Also, the WGM title (2300 FIDE + norms) is nothing to scoff at. Most players on the planet (male or female) will never reach that level of play.

I know where snowflake originated.  It just applies so much better to the people that habitually use it often.  

So then you are arguing that women do not benefit from wealth accumulated by their families? Do you have a point to make? or just more toxic parroting of Whoopi's crib notes from the View?

Nope, that does not follow and was never stated.  You guys *really* need to learn how logic works.  If you can't even make a single point without making up an argument in your head, then you will never argue your way out of a paper bag.

--

This just shows your complete lack of intellectual dishonesty, its a direct line as the crow flies, a direct implication of what you were saying, regarding "systemic sexism" and "Wealth". Its ironic that you don't like the reframing of "wealth" to "family wealth". From reading your unremarkable bile, I might have expected you to appreciate the equivocation, it is after all, the primary weapon of delusional and dishonest leftists.

Why does this topic exist it’s the stupidest thing ever

Stop you’re wasting your time

You can be doing something much better than talking about how chess.com is anti-feminist whichchess.com is not like what the f**k

This is not where "snowflake" originated, it was used to describe the weak and ideologically possessed undergrads in western colleges that demand "safe spaces", which denotes a "space" free from ideas that they cannot debate because their worldview has indefensible components. They are called snowflakes because they choose to try and marginalize and silence instead of learning to debate and defend their ideas with real arguments.

I know where snowflake originated.  It just applies so much better to the people that habitually use it often.  

--

But if you agree to the definition, then you can't in good faith say it applies as you suggest, the people you are vilifying are not trying to silence anyone, they are just debating that the rules against marginalization and othering must apply to all. 

Bro are you gonna acknowledge me like seriously you could be doing something much better with your time then talking about how chess.com is anti-feminist which Chess.com is not you’re wasting your time Please stop

Technically it is an argument, its a fallacy, its called Ad Hominem,  you are arguing that because someone thinks "smoking is cool" then their ideas or opinion must be wrong about something else, its a fallacy people should have learned in high school. Andrew Tate? what is wrong with you? You are obviously not a serious person. It's sad what has happened to you. I'm so sorry.

How would you know what "has happened to me", when your account is 36 minutes old?

I give your input as much value as I give any other sockpuppet's...that is, none at all.  Man up.

--

Well I don't know, hence the question, whatever It was, It's so very tragic. It's just so impressive that you can carry on. Good for you.

Stop it you’re all being really toxic about this you’re all being really toxic about nothing and there’s no point for this why are you doing this there’s no point

Good question!

Get the other guys