Him casually mentioning his book is not spamming. This isn't 1997. Get your internet forum slang straight.
Bringing up a completely different topic and including a link for purchasing is not "casually" mentioning a book. Get your English straight.
Him casually mentioning his book is not spamming. This isn't 1997. Get your internet forum slang straight.
Bringing up a completely different topic and including a link for purchasing is not "casually" mentioning a book. Get your English straight.
To be fair, his book is completely on topic.
Really? It discusses whether "the originators of chess intended it to be so difficult to checkmate a properly castled King in the middlegame" as pondered by the OP?
It discusses how to win the middle game quickly. OP stated that lots of games get into the endgame, thus chess was flawed. streetfighter is saying they don't have to, and if you read his book, you'll learn how to end games in the middlegame. Hardly spam, or off-topic, but maybe a bit opportunistic. It appears however, you've successfully usurped RQ as the thread blowhard...
Him casually mentioning his book is not spamming. This isn't 1997. Get your internet forum slang straight.
Bringing up a completely different topic and including a link for purchasing is not "casually" mentioning a book. Get your English straight.
Then retards like you, who might learn something from it, would have to pay full price like everyone else.
Oh yeah, and go fuck yourself you offensive little shite
Hey spammer, can you spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e ? 
Him casually mentioning his book is not spamming. This isn't 1997. Get your internet forum slang straight.
Bringing up a completely different topic and including a link for purchasing is not "casually" mentioning a book. Get your English straight.
Cystem, stop being a dick. If it hadn't had some relevance I wouldn't have mentioned it. If I stop mentioning it, I might just stop the chess.com discount at the same time. Then retards like you, who might learn something from it, would have to pay full price like everyone else.
Oh yeah, and go fuck yourself you offensive little shite
lol
Such obvious rhetorical craft! I can't wait to read your book!
It seems a lot of people take this forum thing very seriously... 
I recommend that you read the part of my post whereby I state members of chess.com (all members) receive a discount (@34%).
Your spam post didn't say one thing about a discount. The only place you've even mentioned it was a sentence where you threatened to throw a tantrum and discontinue a discount.
If, indeed, you did hold direct discussions with chess.com, then you probably should have said so instead of alienating your entire clientele and performing a bannable offense by directly attacking a fellow poster with obscene and forbidden language.
I doubt very very much if I have alienated my 'entire clientele'. My direct attack on an obnoxious little man, using 'obscene and forbidden' language, was wholly justified
Should you require some help pulling that metal rod out of your ass Mr Blunderful, just ask and I will post a link here.
Exactly as I said. The only place you mentioned any discount was a threat to remove it.
You seem like a sad pedantic little man, and for this I pity you.
'Obscene and forbidden' are of course judgements; here they are judged by chess.com. Fine. Usually I respect that - tonight I happen not to be in the mood for pathetic little haters like 'failure'.
I do not hurt my own business by being...well...who I am. Quite the opposite. Your point about chess.com business though is valid, and I will refrain from posting in that fashion again (until next time ).
Save the sarcasm. It doesn't suit you at all.
You must be very tall. Your most commonly employed adjective that you intend to be negative is little. You've been stuck on that for several posts. I'd think a writer would prefer more variety.
Congratulations on your sale to to miss congeniality. Your spam worked.
Post number 55 five is the most brilliant one I've ever seen.
wow, I'm beginning to wish I hadn't asked...
I'm quite happy using 'little' for you, failure, and for your lawyer
lawyer? I don't get you, spammer. Please enlighten.
Funny that the guy making charges of being "obnoxious" and "offensive" is the one feeling it necessary to go back and edit out some of his own posts.
This isn't the first time "CM" Streetfighter feels justified to go all-out and go ad hominem using foul language, while apparently opposing against something very condemnable
Oh great. A spammer joins the mix.
Spam? Hardly - the majority of games at amateur level CAN be won quickly if you prepare blah blah blah blah blah
And how does any of that keep your post, designed to sell something and make you money, from being spam?