The FIDE rating is more realistic than the Chess.com rating , because the Sonneborn-Berger system or the Swiss system is a more realistic rating than the rating that results from a game of a lower rating with a lower rating that does not enter the competition of a higher rating , for example, the first who is in the competition with a lower rating could beat someone with a higher rating, which would in that way reduce their rating more when they lose to a lower rating, until the lower rating would increase more with a higher rating would win , while when players of approximately the same rating play then the rating increase or decrease a little , although the first one of them can be stronger than several of them with a higher rating . So often players with a higher rating leave the game when they see that they have to play with a player with a lower rating, because if by chance they lose, they lose a lot of points, so the rating Chess.com is not real , It so often happens that a rating of 900 comes among the rights in competition with a rating of 2000 or more
Is it possible to 1000 elo without losing a single battle

link https://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/ writes ;
Critter 1.6a 64-bit 4CPU ELO 3200 , Rybka 4 64-bit 4CPU ELO 3186 , Hannibal 1.7 64-bit 4CPU ELO 3196 , so let Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura play 50 tournaments with Critter 1.6a 64-bit 4CPU , Rybka 4 64-bit 4CPU , Hannibal 1.7 64-bit 4CPU to see what ELO they will have after those tournaments

> Is it possible to 1000 elo without losing a single battle
Yes
Do you was play a one game compatible to LEO 2250 ranged by Stockfish 17 engine review ?

> Do you was play a one game compatible to LEO 2250 ranged by Stockfish 17 engine review ?
Wat?
I was looked the picture at your page that write game rating 2250
???