is kings gambit best opening for beginners?

Sort:
polebuster

i think so

Nekhemevich

actually I always felt learning the ruy was better, but kings gambit is interesting. For me the kings gambit is slightly risky to put in the hands of a novice, but I guess it depends on the individual.

steve_bute

Is a kitchen blender the best toy for a 6-month-old child? I think so too.

I_Am_Second
polebuster wrote:

i think so

NO.  It dosnt teach the opening principles.

Nekhemevich

I'll stand by the recommendation to learn two knights if your a beginner

Nekhemevich

as long as you have solid development and castle early.

steve_bute
I_Am_Second wrote:
polebuster wrote:

i think so

NO.  It dosnt teach the opening principles.

I think I can make a strong argument for the KGA providing an excellent venue for severe and rapid punishment of deviations from good opening principles.

LethalRook_1892
Not for beginners who don't know how a bishop can dominate a knight or why u shouldn't trade a queen for a pawn
kindaspongey

The King’s Gambit by John Shaw
http://www.chessvibes.com/?q=review-the-king%E2%80%99s-gambit
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7093.pdf

Brontide88

Beginners should play openings according to the general rules of development & not worry about learning variation. They should spend more time learning tactics & basic endings. Most beginners don't lose games because they weren't up on opening variations. They lose by overlooking simple tactics or because they are clueless in the ending. Work on those areas first; openings aren't going anywhere.

CROCHESSFAN

No because its the sharpest opening where you play with weaknesses from the start. You should look to play it safe, with kings gambit its like you are saying to your opp i am better player and i am gonna win.

 

NeilBerm

maybe after consistent use it could improve proficiency in tactics and teach basic principles about quick development/central control/attacking f7