Thanks, when you post your answers can you please tell me what engine you used?
Why do you feel that your engine is broken?
This position came from a puzzle book written by a GM. Yet my computer cannot find the answer, therefore I conclude my engine might be broken. It has been acting very weird lately in general.
The top two moves that Stockfish 16 is giving me are 19.Rc6 and 19.0-0.
Interesting. My engine can't find Rc6 which is the best move. Is there another way to see if my computer engine is sub-par?
Interesting. My engine can't find Rc6 which is the best move. Is there another way to see if my computer engine is sub-par?
What engine are you running?
mine tells me RC6
Thanks, when you post your answers can you please tell me what engine you used?
i used stockfish 16
I don't want to say what engine I'm running, but it sounds to me like my engine sucks.
It gives 0-0 as the only move and gives it +2.10
Is it completely off base here?
Could someone possibly post some positions that might test my chess engine further?
Perhaps positions that are used to test chess computers...
I don't want to say what engine I'm running, but it sounds to me like my engine sucks.
It gives 0-0 as the only move and gives it +2.10
Is it completely off base here?
Could someone possibly post some positions that might test my chess engine further?
Perhaps positions that are used to test chess computers...
I find it completely strange that you are unwilling to state what engine you are using. Giving a +2.1 evaluation after 0-0 isn't unreasonable. The only reason that I can think of that your engine didn't present 19.Rc6 is that only one variations output is being shown when you are analyzing the position. That would mean that it is a problem with the settings rather than the engine.
I don't want to say what engine I'm running, but it sounds to me like my engine sucks.
It gives 0-0 as the only move and gives it +2.10
Is it completely off base here?
Could someone possibly post some positions that might test my chess engine further?
Perhaps positions that are used to test chess computers...
I find it completely strange that you are unwilling to state what engine you are using. Giving a +2.1 evaluation after 0-0 isn't unreasonable. The only reason that I can think of that your engine didn't present 19.Rc6 is that only one variations output is being shown when you are analyzing the position. That would mean that it is a problem with the settings rather than the engine.
If it is a publicly available engine then check to see how many move-pairs deep it looks.
If it is a privately written engine then look into extending the move-pair depth (at a minimum on lines that involve captures).
