And so, even with that refuation, you play it?
And you didn't give close to the best lines for other possible sixth moves like queen to c2 or d2, or bishop to e7 or g5, which maintain equality or better.
So it's not true that "If they dont play for the only square possible they will lose", is it?
How often does this work against blitz or bullet opponents rated 1500?
This is the worst kind of "hope chess".
On the second board, you say black has a material advantage (28-30) but black ought not count his trapped knight on h1. Having said that, the whole line is garbage. Qb3 all but wins the game.
And so, even with that refuation, you play it?
And you didn't give close to the best lines for other possible sixth moves like queen to c2 or d2, or bishop to e7 or g5, which maintain equality or better.
So it's not true that "If they dont play for the only square possible they will lose", is it?
How often does this work against blitz or bullet opponents rated 1500?
This is the worst kind of "hope chess".
As i said im not recomending this but it takes the other player some seconds... of corse there are many lines to win
This is just a quick trap for bullet/blitz guys (because classic chess guys wont fall for this i think :P)
If they dont play for the only square possible they will lose,and evene that square will take a few secons to think in so that's also good for bullet/blitz guys...
Lets jump right in!
That's all for now guys hope you got something out of it for who plays the queen's gambit and the nimzo-indian ! :)