Knights vs Bishops

Sort:
marksasaki

Do you prefer knights or bishops? I guess it depends on the situation / stage of game / material status etc. However I tend to find bishops a lot harder to handle, especially if my opponent has both. They have a much bigger range than knights and can prove difficult to remove. Notwithstanding this I actually am better at using knights than bishops and would rather keep my knights in an exchange.

Welcome your thoughts!

Mark


ZackAttack77
I prefer having my knights over my bishops in any case, as it allows for a broader array of movment. A well placed pawn setup can block any bishop but knights can still move "over" pawn defences. Also i prefer to be able to threaten multiply pieces with knights while bishops hardly maintain that ability. In almost any game situation with even peices i will trade my bishop for an opponents knight.
Checkers4Me

I usually prefer knights and will almost always exchange my bishop for the opponents knight.

I think because it is easier for me to predict the movement of the bishop than the knight. Too many times has the opponents knight given me problems.


KingLeopold

From my website http://AmChessCoaching.com

 

For a few years in the late 80's/early 90's, I wrote a column for the
now-defunct USA Today Sportsline online chess site.  It was originally
called "The Linc" and was the first ever online chess playing site, the
precursor for ICC, etc.

Mike Petersen
 

THE CHESS SCENE

by Mike Petersen

"Knights or Bishops?"     

Time to answer the age-old question: which are better, knights or
bishops? There have been numerous tomes written on the subject, but
none of them have, in my opinion, attacked the real heart of the
question. All they do is tell about the relative strengths and
weaknesses of the knight or bishop in various positions. The question
of which is the better piece depends upon much more than that.

For one thing, did you ever see how players line up their pieces at
the beginning of the game? Which do they spend the most time over, the
knights or the bishops? Right. You see, everybody has their own ideas
about which way the knight should be facing. Some, like myself, think
that the knights should begin the game facing the king. Others feel
that both knights should face the same direction. Then there are those
who are aggressively minded and point their knights at the opponent's
army. On the other hand, who has ever seen anyone arrange his bishops
with any particular care? How many of us really care which way the
slit in the bishop's head faces? Do you?

Then there is the matter of how one picks up the pieces. Lifting a
knight takes some thought, you know. Do you pick it up with your thumb
and forefinger, or do you use the index and middle fingers to lift it?
This latter method, by the way, is used most often by those who face
their knights toward the enemy position at the beginning of the game.
Now look at the bishop. Everybody just grabs. No thought required
here! Pick it up and put it down. Whoopee. Let me tell you, moving a
knight is an act of love for some of us. No other piece seems to fit
so well in our fingers.

Also, take a close look at the pieces. Which piece do you think takes
the most effort to make? Right again. Why, advertisements for chess
sets are always claiming that the knights are "beautifully hand
carved" but mention nothing about the bishops. That's because they're
all turned out on lathes like all the other pieces on the board. I've
never seen a set advertised with the comment "beautifully hand carved
bishops", have you? Obviously, then, more work goes into making the
knight than any other piece on the board. There must be a reason.

Another thing. When someone is in time trouble, the piece they dread
the most is...right on...the knight! The worst thing that can befall
someone the exchange ahead is the KNIGHT FORK coming out of nowhere!
Ugh, it's happened to me, and it's no fun. No sir.

So, when you get right down to it, there really is no contest. The
question of which is the best piece doesn't even have to be asked.
Now, if they could only learn to spell it without all those silent
letters...
 

 


marksasaki

great post King Leopold. I am glad to know that I'm not alone in my fondness for hand crafted chess sets. Tis much nicer to play on a real board with real pieces rather than using a mouse button. Its a pity thats not always practical and real life opponents are not always available. I hear you though - Nights are better?!


Azoth
I think the real answer is "There is not any Absolute answer at all", but particulary i find more usefull my bishops but it might be cose i tend to play open games, now some one that tend to play closed / semi open games surely will tell you that he prefer his knight.
Lions
My opinion is that knights are more useful if queens are still on the board.  Knight + Queen is unfuckwithable.  I'd rather have my bishop pair for the endgame, though, 'cause they got that cross-board stone gaze.