lose a queen or lose two rooks?

Sort:
dimitros
[COMMENT DELETED]
Dragec
Losing even one rook will probably cost you a game. Losing(not sacrificing) two rooks or queen, and you can resign imidiatelly, so it's the same. Losing either of them will(almost certain) lose a game. I have a feeling that you meant to ask different question, but I answered based on what you wrote.
dimitros
Dragec wrote:
Losing even one rook will probably cost you a game. Losing(not sacrificing) two rooks or queen, and you can resign imidiatelly, so it's the same. Losing either of them will(almost certain) lose a game. I have a feeling that you meant to ask different question, but I answered based on what you wrote.

yes wrong typing of the question

its sacrificingInnocent

Dragec
:-)
Dragec
or perhaps exchange - queen for 2 rooks ?
dimitros

no sacrifice

SimonSeirup

Yeah, i dont get the point of the question either.

dimitros
Dargone wrote:

Sacrifice? I still don't get the question? If you sacrifice a queen or two rooks and get a winning position then it is a sound sacrifice. Hell if you sacrifice a queen and two rooks for mate then it's a great sacrifice!

If the question is a queen or two rooks then of course it will depend on the situation/position.


you did got the question Dargone.thats what im asking.

the answer is the anticipated one but getting answers from different personalities i might get the thing that will give more ideas and tell me something more from the usual..