Rybka 3 Human 1-cpu w32:
2 00:00 131 134.144 0.00 f7f6
3 00:00 220 14.080 0.00 f7f6
3 00:00 662 21.184 +0.09 Be7d6
4+ 00:00 750 24.000 +0.29 Be7d6
4 00:00 1.169 25.469 +0.26 Be7d6
4+ 00:00 1.445 23.486 +0.49 Be7a3
4 00:00 1.726 22.372 +0.56 Be7a3
5 00:00 2.414 19.775 +0.39 Be7a3 Rc1c2
6 00:00 3.517 20.938 +0.37 Be7a3 Rc1c2 f7f6
7 00:00 5.125 22.331 +0.25 Be7a3 Rc1c2 f7f6 Ne5c4
7 00:00 7.889 23.483 +0.41 Be7d6 Rf1e1 f7f6 Ne5f3
8 00:00 11.952 23.764 +0.28 Be7d6 Rf1e1 f7f6 Ne5f3 Bd6f4
9 00:01 20.873 23.617 +0.28 Be7d6 Rf1e1 f7f6 Ne5f3 Bb7d5 c3c4
10 00:03 74.077 21.230 +0.10 Be7d6 Rf1e1 f7f6 Ne5f3 Rd8e8 Qd1c2 g7g6 Bd3e4 Bb7xe4
10 00:05 118.484 22.870 +0.14 Be7a3 Rc1c2 Ba3d6
11 00:07 164.842 22.971 +0.14 Be7a3 Rc1c2 Ba3d6 Rf1e1 f7f6 Ne5f3 Rd8e8 g2g3 Ra8c8 Nf3d2
12 00:14 332.282 23.527 +0.13 Be7a3 Rc1c2 Ba3d6 Rf1e1 f7f6 Ne5f3 Rd8e8 g2g3 Ra8d8 Nf3d2 Bb7d5
If you understand the above and can put it into a meaningful context which will help you improve your game in general then by all means go for it. (but you can't). The truth is that computers play Chess totally differently from people and so to try to get a computer to help you improve is never going to be the full package. You don't learn any ideas or strategies from simply seeing piles of calculation, it might be able to tell you that a move is a good move but it can't tell you why except that it will have you in a better position in 15 moves, so what's the point? You're never going to be able to replicate what makes a computer good so therefore it is pointless as a tool in any strategic respect.
Hey I know computer's have taken over the chess world a bit so you think they can do everything do right so why is it that one of my closet's friend's and biggest rival still asking people for help. My question is What's the difference between human analysis and computer analysis because I know a few player's that have Rybka !!! and still go to people for analysis of their game's. Sorry if I sound like I'm totally against humans.