Magnus Carlsen is an embarrassment

@autobunny and everybody else Please ignore him (i.e. @priyanshumishra). He is beyond our help and I feel sad that he has a very poor mindset. 

And very limited vocabulary. 

Sadly I don't think @priyanshumishra knows what half the words he uses mean.  Cuckold hardly qualifies as a swear word 😂

priya is Giri in disguise, I think

seriously chess .com get rid of this moron and throw him off the site already

Speaking as a mod I am speechless. This is an absolute no-go, many reports and so on. No contemporary website is so „under-moderated“. Quo vadis?

As far as this thread is concerned: I rest my case.

I can not believe something has not been done to get this guy out of here, this site has young people on it all the time and there is no place here for this kind of garbage!

maybe magnus knew what he was doing and offered a draw. you arent a worldchampion are you. you are propably not as smart as carlsen in chess.

If you read the whole thread, you'll find that many of us have already made this point. The problem isn't with Magnus. The problem is with the format that rewards doing this. He wouldn't have offered a draw if that had resulted in another two longplay games by way of tiebreaker, he would have tried to win game 12.

Are you talking about Magnus?

Of course not. 12 games is too short, both Carlsen and Caranua said as much as after the match. It doesn't improve matters that they have a rapidplay and blitz tiebreak. A longer match without mixing in other forms than longplay chess would do trick, for sure.

You faggots arguing over about the ugliest chess player in the world offering you a draw get over yourself tosser boo hop bunch of whiney nerds wouldn't last a day in the real world mm

BontheCat, That's hilarious that you just Googled to try to figure out the drawing rates in elite chess because you don't know how to actually search it using ChessBase, so you still got the figures wrong. Everything you said about the drawing rates in this match and what would happen in a 24 game match are wrong. You're the typical uneducated guy who knows nothing about chess, but for whatever reason, just has to spout really stupid things aggressively and arrogantly, then give lectures to guys 700 points higher-rated than you. I guess forums are the only place where you feel you can get any attention with your uninformed viewpoints no one wants to read about. Not a single 24 game match in history has been a drawfest, and in every single one, one player was able to demonstrate a significantly higher level of play. I know you don't know anything about World Championship matches at all, outside of what you will Google now, but every reasonably experienced player already knew this and would have facepalmed seeing your initial comments in this thread.

If anyone is displaying ignorance, Botty Boy, it's you. Please refrain from it, because you're only embarrassing yourself. Also, you're making completely unfounded assumptions about others, since you seem to think that my rating is 800 - it says that yours is 1200. So what? I dont even play rated games on this site (I only play OTB chess). However, FYI - since it clearly is of great important to you that I pull my d*** out and slam it on the table for you to measure it - my score in an unrated 10-game match here against a friend of mine with a Chess.com rating of 1791 was 9:1 in my favour. You can calculate my performance rating from that, Mr Statistical Genius.

Re using ChessBase. Oh, you of little faith. I'm old enough to have used Chess Assistant as well before I moved to ChessBase. Never mind, and it doesn't really matter because each user will get different results, since their databases are not going to be identical due to whether they update from TWIC and other sites publishing games or not. My point stands until we run the same analysis on FIDE's own results database (to which I don't have access).

Finally, in your own post just now, you agreed with the point I was making, and have made on several occasions previously: no 24-game match for the World Championship has been a draw fest, whereas the 12-game format has. You can stop trolling now. It's fine, we've understood that someone broke all your toys when you were a little kid. We like you anyway.

Magnus is the most undeserving world champion of all time

People really shouldn’t be as hard on Magnus as they are in this thread. He is easily the fourth or fifth best player of his generation and probably a top 50 player all time. That’s quite the achievement. 

Magnus Carlsen has the highest rating of all times (amongst uncountable tournament wins) against the highest competition ever. If you ask he is by far the best ever, who else?

The old guys who played adjourned games? Ridiculous.

Of course Carlsen is a joke, everybody knows this is true. BTW- Ali was a phony-too much rope-a-dope, Lebron is a ball hog-scores too many points, Pele couldn't foot a ball to save his soul, Nicklaus never amounted to much-couldn't putt, Hank Aaron struck out too much, Joe Montana was too short to win anything.

"Grits ain't groceries

Eggs ain't poultry

and Mona Lisa was a man." (Little Milton)