MOST STUPID RULE : STALEMATE


I'd think he/she wouldn't be such a good player if they were complaining about the rule.

Folks speaking bs about stalemate...Just answer one question. Its your opponents move...he
isnt in check...and has no legal moves left....What is he supposed to do ?

Folks speaking bs about stalemate...Just answer one question. Its your opponents move...he
isnt in check...and has no legal moves left....What is he supposed to do ?
summon the all powerful mega chess a tron

Folks speaking bs about stalemate...Just answer one question. Its your opponents move...he
isnt in check...and has no legal moves left....What is he supposed to do ?
summon the all powerful mega chess a tron
lol


I know tat. My comment was intended to make it easier for ppl who criticize the rule to understand why the rule exists.

I've long believed that the player who delivers stalemate should lose as a penalty for poor play.
haha true


Now after understanding the rule I still get low tier players complaints i just asked for clarification because i made a misplay that ended it in a stalemate but i thought i had won because my oppenent didnt have any moves left but after knowing the rule im on a win streak i think its a solid rule that demonstrates that you have to accurately be able to close out a game


I've long believed that the player who delivers stalemate should lose as a penalty for poor play.
That is idiotic!
That would mean the following position, which I had in a tournament game as White, would be a loss for Black the moment he goes Ke6, which he did, basically surrendering to the draw which he cannot avoid anyway?
He can go to g6 and I just toggle on the 2nd rank until he allows the stalemate ot advances a pawn into a drawn 2-on-1, or he can end the game immediately, like he did, with 1...Ke6 to which I played 2.Re2+!! and he took and stormed out the door pissed that he drew rather than won. This should not be a loss for Black by any stretch!

Another I have pulled multiple times!
Or
In the latter, if he walks across to g8, then Rf8+ and I get behind the King.

AshleyDogler wrote:
How is this a draw hes in checkmate
If one player has insufficient material and cannot move their king without being put into check, it is stalemate.

Interesting to see people saying that only bad players could be against such a rule.
Perhaps the GMs and world champions who have, in the past, argued that the rule should be changed are actually just bad at chess?

I've long believed that the player who delivers stalemate should lose as a penalty for poor play.
That is idiotic!
Sorry if I caused you distress. The above is just my snarky rejoinder to people who complain about not winning when they deliver stalemate. It might not reflect my actual opinion on the matter.