MY CHESS SUCKS!!

Sort:
VULPES_VULPES
Rickett2222 wrote:

Bottom Vulpes liner you give me games that you want me to analyze.

Okay. I'll PM you.

jtb587

Your problem is that you dont capture enough of your opponent's pieces before he captures yours

VULPES_VULPES
jbarksdale56 wrote:

Your problem is that you dont capture enough of your opponent's pieces before he captures yours

VERY HELPFUL

cdowis75

Some suggestions:

1. Play only opponents who are at least 200-300 rating points above you.  If you want to become a 2100 player, play 2100 opponents.  

2. Do not have more than 5-6 games simultaneously.  Don't waste your time on making puzzles, posting, etc.

3. Play only standard (live 30 minute or online).  Forget about blitz games.

4. Don't worry about blunders.  Even the world champion made a silly blunder recently.  Just don't make it a habit.

VULPES_VULPES
cdowis75 wrote:

Some suggestions:

1. Play only opponents who are at least 200-300 rating points above you.  If you want to become a 2100 player, play 2100 opponents.  

2. Do not have more than 5-6 games simultaneously.  Don't waste your time on making puzzles, posting, etc.

3. Play only standard (live 30 minute or online).  Forget about blitz games.

4. Don't worry about blunders.  Even the world champion made a silly blunder recently.  Just don't make it a habit.

1. Yes I try to do that. I assume you're talking about CC, since it's IMPOSSIBLE to get a game if you set a rating restiction on live.

2. I started these games a while ago. I try to get the numbers down as soon as possible. I also stopped posting puzzles and stuff most of the time.

3. Yes I do that.

4. My personal goal is to not lose through pure blundering. If my opponent outdid me in strategic application or tactical calculation, then I'll accept it. But losses - and wins - achieved solely by simple blunders from either side is, to me, not worth analyzing.

shell_knight
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time Tongue Out

VULPES_VULPES
shell_knight wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time

I'm not in school

DORAEMONCHESS

Vulpes, what knid of stories do you write? I can't see your blog.

SilentKnighte5
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
shell_knight wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time

I'm not in school

Maybe you should be?

VULPES_VULPES
DORAEMONCHESS wrote:

Vulpes, what knid of stories do you write? I can't see your blog.

My works can be found on Figment.com

VULPES_VULPES
SilentKnighte5 wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
shell_knight wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time

I'm not in school

Maybe you should be?

I'm in grade 13, technically, but I get this semester off.

DORAEMONCHESS
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
SilentKnighte5 wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
shell_knight wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time

I'm not in school

Maybe you should be?

I'm in grade 13, technically, but I get this semester off.

You'e in college?

VULPES_VULPES
DORAEMONCHESS wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
SilentKnighte5 wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
shell_knight wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time

I'm not in school

Maybe you should be?

I'm in grade 13, technically, but I get this semester off.

You'e in college?

no

still in high school - although technically I graduated.

I need to do more HS courses before heading off to university.

LoekBergman

I looked at your game against JustinTenz. What I see is that you do overlook short combinations, like 11.a4 and 24.Qb5+.

I also don't see you playing with a plan. I can understand tactically why you play Raf8, but I would have preferred Qe6, because I would like to bring both rooks into play. It might not be that problematic to lose the pawn on h6 as the king is placed on h1.

After 13... Kxd7 would I expect you to make some reordering moves, by which you improve your overall position. I would expect you to make a choice to put your king safe on the queen side or the king side and have some moves making that possible and have an idea where to place your pieces.

You could have continued after 14.d3 h6 15.Na3 Qe6 16.Nc4 Bf6 and your knight is free to go. Now could you start playing with your king side pawns backed up by your rooks starting an attack on the king side. The pawn structure is good for it.

VULPES_VULPES
LoekBergman wrote:

I looked at your game against JustinTenz. What I see is that you do overlook short combinations, like 11.a4 and 24.Qb5+.

I also don't see you playing with a plan. I can understand tactically why you play Raf8, but I would have preferred Qe6, because I would like to bring both rooks into play. It might not be that problematic to lose the pawn on h6 as the king is placed on h1.

After 13... Kxd7 would I expect you to make some reordering moves, by which you improve your overall position. I would expect you to make a choice to put your king safe on the queen side or the king side and have some moves making that possible and have an idea where to place your pieces.

You could have continued after 14.d3 h6 15.Na3 Qe6 16.Nc4 Bf6 and your knight is free to go. Now could you start playing with your king side pawns backed up by your rooks starting an attack on the king side. The pawn structure is good for it.

Could you provide a link? I can't find the game.

LoekBergman

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=98574524

VULPES_VULPES
LoekBergman wrote:

I looked at your game against JustinTenz. What I see is that you do overlook short combinations, like 11.a4 and 24.Qb5+.

I also don't see you playing with a plan. I can understand tactically why you play Raf8, but I would have preferred Qe6, because I would like to bring both rooks into play. It might not be that problematic to lose the pawn on h6 as the king is placed on h1.

After 13... Kxd7 would I expect you to make some reordering moves, by which you improve your overall position. I would expect you to make a choice to put your king safe on the queen side or the king side and have some moves making that possible and have an idea where to place your pieces.

You could have continued after 14.d3 h6 15.Na3 Qe6 16.Nc4 Bf6 and your knight is free to go. Now could you start playing with your king side pawns backed up by your rooks starting an attack on the king side. The pawn structure is good for it.

Thanks for your analysis. I'll keep this in mind when I pick up CC games again.

DORAEMONCHESS
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
DORAEMONCHESS wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
SilentKnighte5 wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
shell_knight wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
asknotaxe wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:

WHY???

Maybe you spend too much time on the forums and not enough time playing chess ?

WRONG: I spend 80% of my time outside chess.com.

20% of your time is spent on chess.com?  If you're still in school that's probably close to 100% of your free time

I'm not in school

Maybe you should be?

I'm in grade 13, technically, but I get this semester off.

You'e in college?

no

still in high school - although technically I graduated.

I need to do more HS courses before heading off to university.

Wow.... you're still in high school? Is that how things work in Canada?

cdowis75

My suggestions, continued:

5.  You should study endgames.  Silman has an excellent book, so study the first four chapters and focus on king and pawn, and rook endgames.  This will help you to craft your game towards a winning game, and give you more confidence.

6.  Work on understanding on how to create a good plan and how to implement it.  There are several recent excellent videos on strategy -- including how to evaluate a position and create a plan.  Look at Kavutskiy's recent videos on the three basic steps of developing a plan.

I suggest that you go thru all of the lessons in Silman's "Art of Exchanging Pieces" and "Roots of Positional Understanding".  You will begin to see the board as a grandmaster sees it.

I had suggested that you do a maximum of 5-6 games, and now focus your time on these lessons.  You will discover that, as you improve your planning and positional skills, it will be your opponents that are making the blunders instead of you.

VULPES_VULPES
cdowis75 wrote:

My suggestions, continued:

5.  You should study endgames.  Silman has an excellent book, so study the first four chapters and focus on king and pawn, and rook endgames.  This will help you to craft your game towards a winning game, and give you more confidence.

6.  Work on understanding on how to create a good plan and how to implement it.  There are several recent excellent videos on strategy -- including how to evaluate a position and create a plan.  Look at Kavutskiy's recent videos on the three basic steps of developing a plan.

I suggest that you go thru all of the lessons in Silman's "Art of Exchanging Pieces" and "Roots of Positional Understanding".  You will begin to see the board as a grandmaster sees it.

I had suggested that you do a maximum of 5-6 games, and now focus your time on these lessons.  You will discover that, as you improve your planning and positional skills, it will be your opponents that are making the blunders instead of you.

Thanks. I'll try these out sometime, when I have the time.