Not as bad as Kasparov vs Shirov.
Nakamura really is better than Carlsen even if he has ZERO wins,SEVEN(!!) losses
Sort:
Ill check those stats out. Its interesting to try to figure out the reasons for lopsided scores between individuals.
Before anyone gets p****d off at me (better p****d off than p****d on I always say) this is meant as a preemptive joke towards knucklehead that's sure to post the next chance he gets to point out Carlsens not really good, he's just lucky. Stuperking500 I hope you're not comprehensionally challenged.
Yeah, 20 games and not a single win. Naka is 0-7- 13. Wow. 32.5% scoring rate. I feel a little bad for him actually.