New players with a win rate nearly 2 to 3 times wins vs losses. I felt cheated.

My opponent was getting beaten the whole game then suddenly pulls a perfect attack in 20 moves each taking 1 to 3 seconds that lead to a perfect checkmate, the issue was he didn't play with this competence the whole game then within seconds each move had a perfect checkmate. I then look at his stats and he's won 80% of his games and is a new player. I also am new, but you can clearly see I have games of pure stupid this didn't feel right at all I looked, and he went on too win another 4 games after. This is what ruins this site imo.

if it's a new account it could be a higher level player smurfing

A win rate >50% indicates to weak opponents.
The real strength of this player is probably above the initial rating given.
So it takes some time and wins for him to rise to his true level.

He has 64 wins to 21 loses and a few draws.

If it's a new account it could be a higher level player not smurfing.

74% win rate is his % that is very high, even pros have a hard time maintaining that kind of win %...

Example game?

If they are so beaten, how can they launch a mating attack at all?

For a incredibly high rated player like you to ask such a absurd question how many games have you seen where a person was down 8 points and pulls a brilliant move to completely shift a game from a loss to a win? Hikaru vs Magnus and many, many others. My point was very simple to understand. With respect.

This is very rare with sub 1,000 elo and if your opponent was blundering the whole game then comes at you with 20 best moves and a brilliant you of course would say yea I think thats perfectly normal, and then you see they win nearly 75% of all their games that would fit perfectly with the blundering for 20 of 40 moves also right? Ok I will just have to yield to your superior chess skill here, because you are a genius chess player and I have respect for that.

Would you care to show an example game?

I can't remember any Hikaru vs Magnus game where that happened.

I can't post the game, that would be against the rules here. Look down my games to my last loss.

Hikaru had two passed pawns and still couldn't convert a win... In a game against Magnus..

My last loss in rapid, not blitz as I loss constantly in blitz, just not good with it at all.

In your last lost game, there was no brilliant counterattack by white. He simply noticed that he had mate in 2, quite out of the blue. A player rated 1000 is allowed to notice mate in 2, that is not a reasonable basis for accusation.

And his incredible win rate also normal? You can say mate in 2 yes absolutely, again for much of the game he wasn't spoting these attacks. Then had a flurry of strong moves that put him in a postion to mate in two. As I had said at the beginning of our discussion I got over confident in my position and let my guard down as such, I said that could've been the cause. I also said that I felt cheated not that my op cheated. I also said you were a superior chess player and as such yielded to your opinion. I hope your referring to the rapid loss and not the terrible blitz loss I just had.

Report him if youre that suspicious, probably was a higher rated player smurfing

I think magpi is correct. I did blunder allowing the two move checkmate. I was up 6 to 8 points most of the game only to loss terribly at the end. I just looked at his win rate of 75% and couldn't understand how he allowed me to get, so many points ahead of him then just slapped me like nothing at the end of the game. I learned from it.

Fair enough I have a lot to learn.