Next training preparation for 2200+

Also this sentence doesn’t make sense.
Also this sentence doesn’t make sense.
It makes total sense you just can't read it means I did condensed studying of 4 months in 25 hours over 2 days which you will never be able to do because you will quit like a quiter. Like means an approximation of 4 months most people do not study 25 hours over 4 months but I did more studying than you will in a year probably.

4 months of studying 1 hour a day is 120 hours which is 5 days ish, so it is physically impossible to do what you said unless you defy the laws of times.

Stop wasting my time bro. Anyways if anyone wants to assist in training lemme me know only looking for one person.

I don’t believe anybody can effectively solve 200 puzzles a day. My brain is getting exhausted after 30 - 40 minutes of solving hard puzzles (i am 3200 in rated chess.com puzzles).
I don’t believe anybody can effectively solve 200 puzzles a day. My brain is getting exhausted after 30 - 40 minutes of solving hard puzzles (i am 3200 in rated chess.com puzzles).
Lol I already did it bro I did 500 puzzles yesterday 200 today and 200 before. Woodpecker yes those are taxing
already higher rated than you Lol Typical bad player.

So I am in decent form now I need to focus on getting as many patterns as possible I intend to do 200 puzzles a day plus 10 woodpecker per day and IM coach with analysis for a year. I estimate should bring me to NM level strength. Over these 2 days I did like 4 months of studying in 25 hours of studying. I dramatically improved my understanding. I tend to prefer super intense study periods over short-term gradual periods. Now onto 2200+ and then army chess championship
There is no promise that the woodpecker method (or working analysis with a chess coach) will boost you to the level of a titled player and certainly not so soon. It can definitely help, but it isn't that sure-fire, or everyone would be using this method.
Rating also becomes much more difficult to gain as you get higher rated. There's some math reasons related to the rating system, but also just the fact that higher rated players have a smaller margin of error in their games, so you'll have to play chess more accurately for longer periods of time if you are to convert your games into a win. At the lower levels, you may be able to easier get away with slightly dubious moves, because they won't be exploited as easily.
Best of luck with your chess progress though
I think itll work pretty well. Progress has been very aggressive. My calculating abilities have skyrocketed so yes tactics+woodpecker =2000+ at least for me imo

It's a training method for chess puzzles which was invented by GM Axel Smith. He wrote a book on this woodpecker method (you can look it up and easily find it). I've never used this method before, but it involves a specific process of solving a lot of chess puzzles and then the very next day solving the exact same puzzles again. The idea is that you will remember the ideas from the previous day and hopefully be able to solve these quicker and more accurately. The system also has some "rest days" built into it, but the idea is that this repetition helps your brain process the patterns of those puzzles more easily.
I know how the process works been doing it for months now It works alright the calculation practice and process is just super boring is all. It's just insanely boring to calculate all the variations and what not but most of the positions are superior to most of the puzzles on chess.com I'd say.

I don’t believe anybody can effectively solve 200 puzzles a day. My brain is getting exhausted after 30 - 40 minutes of solving hard puzzles (i am 3200 in rated chess.com puzzles).
Yeah, this is my primary concern with this woodpecker method too. I think the system also includes many "simple" puzzles for your level, but regardless what level of puzzles are used, this system is a ton of puzzles. The final day of this woodpecker method is actually the ENTIRE month's worth of puzzles solved in one day. To be fair, you have been seeing these same puzzles for a month (read my post above), but still. That's a ton of puzzles and time invested.
So I am in decent form now I need to focus on getting as many patterns as possible I intend to do 200 puzzles a day plus 10 woodpecker per day and IM coach with analysis for a year. I estimate should bring me to NM level strength. Over these 2 days I did like 4 months of studying in 25 hours of studying. I dramatically improved my understanding. I tend to prefer super intense study periods over short-term gradual periods. Now onto 2200+ and then army chess championship