Participating in first tournament...how will it go?

Sort:
BlackWarmaster
ThrillerFan a écrit :
BlackWarmaster wrote:

what makes otb so different?

 

  • Fatigue factor

There are numerous other factors.  This is just a few of them!

 

 

Thanks ThrillerFan for fullfilling my curiosity. Regarding the fatigue, staring at a screen is really exhausting for the eye and the brain though.

ameraljic

UPDATE!

Actually participated in my first blitz tournament today! Time controls were 3 | 2 and we played a total of 18 games! Average opponent rating was 2100 and I got 2 score out of 18. 2 draws and 1 win. I should have had AT LEAST 5 score, one game I was up a pawn and gave away my queen against a 2200, another game I gave away queen against a ~1800 player and another game I had a draw against a 2300 but I did a dumb knight sac at the end that costed me the game. NEVERTHELESS, I played really bad chess and could have done so much better but according to initial FIDE rating calculator my rating should be roughly    1749.  https://ratings.fide.com/calculator_rp.phtml

 

 

aa-ron1235
nighteyes1234 wrote:
aa-ron1235 wrote:

I am sure that this is some witty comeback somewhere, but i am having trouble understanding it. Can you please rephrase? Are you saying that I am not high rated enough to judge, or that you are better than what i am suggesting you are? Or something else entirely? Thank you! 

 

Something else....I was remarking on chess.com blitz rating vs FIDE rating. IM Silman, who has a following, supposedly said that chess.com blitz players were inflated by 400pts vs USCF. So then USCF is said to be 200 pts inflated higher than FIDE. So that would put me around 1100-1200 FIDE. Eeks.

 

 

 

Ah. Thanks! I dont think that is quite right. I am 1700 USCF (1701) and 1400 fide (1438) so i dont know how that correlates. However, I try OTB, where online i often play the barnes happy.png

 

ameraljic

Good responses!
yes, it was a different feeling plating OTB than online but I have to say, since I had really good positions with FMs, CMs och people with 2000+ rating that it isnt particularly harder than on chess.com. People who claim Chess.com ratings are deflated aretotally wrong! I’d estimate my fide strength to be 1900 blitz which is roughly the same as this site. 

Blunderpatzer
ameraljic wrote:

Good responses!
yes, it was a different feeling plating OTB than online but I have to say, since I had really good positions with FMs, CMs och people with 2000+ rating that it isnt particularly harder than on chess.com. People who claim Chess.com ratings are deflated aretotally wrong! I’d estimate my fide strength to be 1900 blitz which is roughly the same as this site. 

After looking at some of your daily and Rapid games I think you will be around 1650-1750 Fide. You are very fast but you do not know much about chess. The quality of your moves in Rapid is not much better than in blitz so the extra time in classic otb will most likely help ur opponents more than you.

That does of course not mean that you cannot improve over time. Just go for it and try it out. Good luck!

ameraljic

I do play long time controls as well and am roughly 1700 rated rapid here. However I avoid it because I keep getting notification messeages from chess.com constantly that I have gotten extra elo points because opponents broke fair policy (aka used engines and cheated).

 

On top of that if u look at rating distrubutions they seem to be lower on rapid thus I’d say a 1700 rapid rating probably corresponds to higher than 1700 fide - this as pretty much 99th percentile on chess.com is already at ~ 1900 rating. 

Blunderpatzer
ameraljic wrote:

I do play long time controls as well and am roughly 1700 rated rapid here. However I avoid it because I keep getting notification messeages from chess.com constantly that I have gotten extra elo points because opponents broke fair policy (aka used engines and cheated).

 

On top of that if u look at rating distrubutions they seem to be lower on rapid thus I’d say a 1700 rapid rating probably corresponds to higher than 1700 fide - this as pretty much 99th percentile on chess.com is already at ~ 1900 rating. 

I do not really understand your reasoning.  I guess you are playing rapid games in order to get more experience at playing "longer" time controls. and not in order to get an as high rapid rating as possible.

Hence, why does it matter that you occasionally run into cheaters? A few times I got totally crushed playing black in the sense that the game was totally lost after 10-15 moves. This only revealed to me that I did not understand the opening white played at all and should invest some time in understanding it. The fact that my opponents did get banned later does not change the fact that I responded very poorly to the opening choice of (the engine).

 

WobblySquares

Don't worry about the results at all and use it to learn as much as possible.

 

I'm sort of in the same boat having recently picked up club and external competition again after a decade of absence.

What works well for me is to try and really understand positions and for that I need a LOT of time.
Not only do I learn a ton each game that way, generally get good positions but it also lures my opponents into thinking I'm a slow poke which often has them playing faster and their quality suffers.
Once I have less than 15 minutes or so left on the clock I have little trouble kicking up a bunch of gears (we have a similar blitz rating) which has a tendency to catch them off guard again.

 

You might be a little surprised by the level of play at first. Routined 1800 OTB guys are Good. They don't seemingly miss a lot and it's about strategy and digging for small advantages/mistakes from which tactics might flow eventually.
So it's a slight switch from tactical blitz mode to long term strategical super precision mode but very rewarding.

Blunderpatzer

 Out of curiosity, what is your Fide Elo WobblySquares? We have a roughly similar blitz and rapid rating, so I wonder if our OTB ratings correspond also.

ameraljic

Interesting remarks WobblySquares! 

SeniorPatzer
DeirdreSkye wrote:

       If you want to leave the tournament after 2 consecutive losses, chess is not for you. You must not leave even after 8 or 80 consecutive losses. Chess is a personality crash test and if you can't handle disappointment you better forget it. It has tons of it. My guess is that you will get a decent score that will give you an ego-boosting and a reason to brag but that doesn't solve anything. Disasters in chess are inevitable. If it isn't in this tournament it will be in the next one. Learning to handle disasters is an inseparable part of a good chessplayer.  It's not only disasters you need to handle, success is a problem too also . Inexperienced players become reckless after one or 2 good results.

    So here is the one and only thing you need to do:

Learn to play each game like it is the first one. 

   It's normal to be sad after a bad result or to be happy after a good one. But once the game starts, everything must be ancient  history. This is not easy , needs practice and experience.

    Enjoy this wonderful experience and focus in absorbing every drop of knowledge and experience it will offer you.

 

    Eat lightly before and during the tournament(sandwich with whole grain bread,  boiled chicken and vegetables is highly recommended). Stomach problems will make you play bad but you don't want to feel hungry either. Have a fruit with you as it offers long lasting energy because of fructose but avoid anything that has sugar as it creates a burst of energy levels and  a quick drop. Banana is the perfect solution as it is light for the stomach and offers tyrosine and tryptophan that are used as brain fuel. And rest well!

     Good luck!

 

Awesome advice!

ameraljic

UPDATE!
Currently participating in a tournament and played my 3 first rapid games today, ended up scoring 2/3, completely blundered away my bishop against a 1770 elo guy.

Here is a game I played against a 1611 ELO rated player, didn't even bother thinking too much and I only used 17 mins on the clock, opponent used 40.

 

I PLAYED BLACK. 

 

ameraljic

 ANOTHER update:

 

Have a 2.5/4 score. Average opponent rating 1750.

Drew a 1855 guy yesterday. I guess my 1850 blitz/1700 rapid on chess.com corresponds to roughly 1800 FIDE STD.

cellomaster8
Just saying, you’d probably need to participate in a larger amount of tournaments to develop a more accurate correlation between the FIDE and chess.com ratings
ameraljic
cellomaster8 wrote:
Just saying, you’d probably need to participate in a larger amount of tournaments to develop a more accurate correlation between the FIDE and chess.com ratings

 

Yep I know but seeing as I’ve played a 23 round blitz tournament and also absolutely crushed 1600 std players on 1hr+ games it’s an estimate that my rating is definitely somewhere between 1700-2000