people with no pfp in chess.com are actually smart at chess

Yea I mean if we all removed our pfp we would jump 200 rating easy

1. Definitely been burned more than once with that before 

2. I play very aggressively, so sometimes I kinda have to 

3. Yeah that's a solid advice

4. Debatable, especially with the London system

5. Agreed in all but one occasion - scandinavian defense, if they take my pawn, I can't not take

6. What about the sodium attack? Jk, yeah that's solid

7. I'd say a good half of my blunders are either misclicks or me rushing into things, but fair

8. My bread and butter

9. Yeah that's the goal

10. Well, fair

Yea not saying it’s perfect, that stuff just really helped for me.

Yeah, some solid advice there for sure. I've been analyzing every game I can so that I can improve. I just think it's unfair to say that us lowly 500-600 are inherently dumb. Sometimes you just get a string of bad games and drop 300 in rating. Happened to me and I'm trying to climb back up. 

Yea other stuff that really helped was analysing the games after. Especially the first few moves as you can see where your going wrong in the opening, easier to do at first as well as the mistakes will be in first few moves.

eventually start working out what you should be doing so ye keep analysing.

also I didn’t say that rating was dumb at all, just said that does at that point it just mean they pretty much know the moves and maybe not know how to castle, that’s not saying they are inherently bad just that they haven’t learnt much yet?

I feel like you've described 200-400, not 500-600. There are people on that level who are starting to strategize and grow. Then again, if I had a dollar for every time people opened with E4 or responded with D5 to my D4, I'd not have to pay my phone bill this month

#playf4bestopening

#f4g3

the fact that when my pieces are being captured with a online chess person with no pfp I have no idea what to do and panik. last time i resigned because i thought i was playing koth with a random person with pfp

When I started I knew the rules and kinda understood castling and was 1000 so I just assumed that people under 1000 just knew the rules though I never played anyone below 1000 so I wouldn’t really know the difference, I don’t suppose with all the blunders there is much difference between even 400 and 600

Omegalul 

ONO ONO

ONO PON ONO ONO

my reaction to the scandinavian

Stop using my v rancid board theme only I can use it

bruh

it actually looks good

unlike you (impulse sry)

ONO ONO b1Z AtAc mh ONONONON ONO

How do you know what I look like irl :weirdchamp:

its bean a logger time sur

you thought it was art

but it was really me!

Di- (insert name)

mine is walnut theme board board and pieces

Who like my new forum? https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/the-white-pieces-going-first-is-another-example-of-modern-day-white-supremacy

https://www.chess.com/a/NkqBLvsx2DihL okay I think this one will be more to the liking of people who said that the guy was more than 100 points below me

Ye I would take issue with your move 5, remember moving same piece too many times in in first 10 moves also it’s another pawn move. At that point I think you should have instead continued your development

Yeah the engine thinks I should've taken the pawn instead. Honestly I played fairly sloppy, but they played worse 😅