Playing the opponent?

Sort:
erikido23
iwilltry wrote:

Holy jeez I don't like to call people out on stuff like that but you guys are being retards, OR you're doing it on purpose to get a rise out of someone.


 The giveaway.  A classic troll projecting or you really just have no clue.

First thing you learn in public speaking.  If the audience doesn't understand it is not because they are stupid-but because you are a poor public speaker and don't know how to convey your ideas.   

iwilltry

So...out of the several examples, explanations etc..what part of it was difficult to understand?

YOU NEED A REFERENCE POINT TO UNDERSTAND THINGS. ITS LIKE THE SHIPS ANCHOR, THE SHIP WILL SAIL OFF INTO ANY DIRECTION IF THERE IS NO ANCHOR.

And your point about public speaking is completely off base. The audience could simply be stupid. "If the audience (majority of people) doesn't understand something, it is the speaker (individual's) fault"?????? Outstanding!

 

Lets suppose your'e talking about Einstein. He's delivering a speech on Physics. If there are only a few Physicsts out of the several hundred people at this public lecture, and only these physicists understand, who's "at fault" for Einsteins ideas not reaching the majority of people? The Simple Simons or Einstein the person who discovered relativity? It's rhetorical, so I don't really expect some smart ass answer.

bigpoison

The ship will not sail off in any direction, despite your yelling.  It will go either where the wind or current is pushing it.

erikido23
iwilltry wrote:

So...out of the several examples, explanations etc..what part of it was difficult to understand?

YOU NEED A REFERENCE POINT TO UNDERSTAND THINGS. ITS LIKE THE SHIPS ANCHOR, THE SHIP WILL SAIL OFF INTO ANY DIRECTION IF THERE IS NO ANCHOR.

And your point about public speaking is completely off base. The audience could simply be stupid. "If the audience (majority of people) doesn't understand something, it is the speaker (individual's) fault"?????? Outstanding!

 

Lets suppose your'e talking about Einstein. He's delivering a speech on Physics. If there are only a few Physicsts out of the several hundred people at this public lecture, and only these physicists understand, who's "at fault" for Einsteins ideas not reaching the majority of people? The Simple Simons or Einstein the person who discovered relativity? It's rhetorical, so I don't really expect some smart ass answer.


 First of all you are not talking physics.  Very poor analogy.  Second of all yes it would be his fault.  It is upon the speaker to talk in a language that his directed audience can understand.  If einstein knows there are only a few physicists in the audience it would be pretty stupid of him to talk using the most advanced concepts like everyone else knows them.

 

PS.  It wasn't that you didn't want a smart ass answer.  It was that you didn't want an answer proving how stupid your assertion actually is :D 

atomichicken
iwilltry wrote:

LMAO

 

INTERNAL REFERENCE POINT.

 

How do you know what blue is if you don't know what red is?! UNDERSTAND?!?!?!?!?! LMAO!!!!!!


Wow, I can see I've fed you too much. Over and out.

iwilltry

I don't like bringing that shit up either but people are being dense here.