It's not a debate unless someone states an argument.
point system

debate maybe the wrong word, but don't you think a change in the point system is needed.
3 points for victory and 1 point for draw will be a needed improvement in chess!
-3 point for victory. +more people will push even harder for a win because a draw is less attractive. +maybe less people will agree to a draw before the game because is not attractive.
The real winner will be found in 7 rounds tournaments: a player may win with 2 victories and 5 draws (4½/11). Another player with 4 victories only get second place (4/12). with the right change he will win. 12 is more than 11.
I have changed my view from nothing serious to "let us change it".
3 points for victory and 1 point for draw.

This change promotes risk taking and will lead to overall less accurate games which I don't think is a good thing.
I would rather see boring but accurate draws than wins which stem from dubious play.

there would be no downside to draws if draws always were correct. I have been to several tournanments and seen players agree to a draw because mathematically they would not ruin something for them both. afterwards one of them won the tournament. they agreed to a draw very openly everyone knew about it.
to Puroi I don't think it will lead to risk taking just that people will have to prove their endgame skills. we are humans not computers. The last one to make a mistake is usually the persons that looses.
What happened to the fighting spirit in chess?
Hi
I think I see a lot of draws in chess. Some of them are fair, but sometimes I think
two players agree to a draw just to get a ½ point.
I think if the point system was changed so that a win will result in 3 points
and a draw will result in 1 point for each player.
I think we would see a lof of games where both sides push for a win.
I think it would be great if FIDE considered it. what do you think?
I is only a debate. Nothing serious...(because I don't really think someone is going to change it)