program usage
do you really think that you could have get such a won position against an engine?
you had 2 additional rooks!
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=854540407
In this game by move 38 you had 1 more rook and 1 more pawn:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=854535057
Here you gave away a bishop for free in move 6, and in move 26 you gave away a knight... and your opponent didn´t see it until the next move, do you think that an engine will miss that?
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=854530566
evanta: you had totally winning positions in 2 of the games
how is he only ranked 4 hundred something?
for that same reason, if you can get those positions against him, obviously he is not strong. That´s not an engine. Otherwise you would have been killed very fast.
In the third one you were just giving pieces for free one after the other.
And about the rating, he is only playing unrated, how can you expect that his ratings keep moving? (but I think that 400 could be fair, seeing that you can get totally winning positions against him)
then how is he only ranked 4 hundred something....? also, he even admitted it. I had someone play this, who is nationaly ranked, teacher of national players, and had problems with it.... just doesnt make sense. playing faster has nothing to do with it...lol
If you lose on time being 2 rooks ahead, obviously the problem is that you are playing too slow.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.