Everyone say the new puzzle system is completely broken but apparently it doesn't matter to anyone from chess.com. Their new weird ranking is abosultely useless and the usual ranking doesn't mean anything. I've gone from 2400 to 2700 in puzzles without thinking or improving because all the puzzles I have are 1200 max. You get +5 for solving them but -30 if you fail a single one, it's absurd. I don't have a subscription so I only play 3 puzzles a day and it's so useless and boring that I'm just clicking random moves without looking because solving the puzzle doesn't matter since there's no learning and no reward. People say "just change the difficulty" but I did and I just had a 900 puzzle to solve.
A 400 streak of M1 is useless, they give you a bonus in their new ranking thing for speed but no extra points on the actual value that matters. Am I supposed to beg for normal puzzles ? Or is it the desired user experience to make everything worse and worse ? Am I supposed to want to give money to be allowed to solve more useless puzzles ? How did anyone at chess-com validate this thinking it was an improvement... I thought chess was a cerebral game but apparently the biggest chess website has decided that the normal difficulty is just "me move queen me win" so maybe I was wrong.
I'm gonna put the cube in the square hole and the pyramid in the triangle hole, this will make my brain work more than anything on this website.
You just missed this 1042-rated puzzle. You have 3 ways to take on c5.
I think it is not a "just move your queen puzzle."
Everyone say the new puzzle system is completely broken but apparently it doesn't matter to anyone from chess.com. Their new weird ranking is abosultely useless and the usual ranking doesn't mean anything. I've gone from 2400 to 2700 in puzzles without thinking or improving because all the puzzles I have are 1200 max. You get +5 for solving them but -30 if you fail a single one, it's absurd. I don't have a subscription so I only play 3 puzzles a day and it's so useless and boring that I'm just clicking random moves without looking because solving the puzzle doesn't matter since there's no learning and no reward. People say "just change the difficulty" but I did and I just had a 900 puzzle to solve.
A 400 streak of M1 is useless, they give you a bonus in their new ranking thing for speed but no extra points on the actual value that matters. Am I supposed to beg for normal puzzles ? Or is it the desired user experience to make everything worse and worse ? Am I supposed to want to give money to be allowed to solve more useless puzzles ? How did anyone at chess-com validate this thinking it was an improvement... I thought chess was a cerebral game but apparently the biggest chess website has decided that the normal difficulty is just "me move queen me win" so maybe I was wrong.
I'm gonna put the cube in the square hole and the pyramid in the triangle hole, this will make my brain work more than anything on this website.