Question about ratings and players .

Sort:
Cvbagva
magipi wrote:
Cvbagva wrote:

There is obviously a trend. When you play 10 players in a row who have a 1400 elo playing at a 2000/ 1800 level. Somethings totally wrong. I don't know if it's the algorithm

How could you know what level your opponents play at? At best it's a guess.

Just do the game review. I've been playing countless 1400s in a row that play over 90% there's probably something wrong with the rating system.

magipi
Cvbagva wrote:
magipi wrote:
Cvbagva wrote:

There is obviously a trend. When you play 10 players in a row who have a 1400 elo playing at a 2000/ 1800 level. Somethings totally wrong. I don't know if it's the algorithm

How could you know what level your opponents play at? At best it's a guess.

Just do the game review. I've been playing countless 1400s in a row that play over 90% there's probably something wrong with the rating system.

Game Review's rating estimate is just an experimental tool, and it's horribly bad.

The rating system is fine.

HangingPiecesChomper

Yup the rating system here is rigged. It is crazy that a 1400 can play with 90%+ accuracy when i get 70 accuracy on average

SeanTheSheep021

I am rating 900 , but I just can’t increase my rating cuz 900 players just play so fast and I lose by timeout. But if I join tournaments, I can literally beat a 2300 (which I already did before)

TheCobraisaready

The lag in bullet is shocking, how can it be fair to compete when each move takes 2 or 3 seconds when you've literally made it instantly in milliseconds, noticed this happens a lot to British players , I take it if you buy a membership the lag would go away?