That doesnt sound stupid at all
Ratings

Loomis, there is no need to get personal. The OP referred to two specific games, he never said (nor implied) they were his only ones, and his playing history can be easily researched through his profile. You seemed to spend a lot of energy arguing with and demeaning someone about 1/4 your age.

Perhaps to help clarify Loomis' point. Given the information that the OP drew against a 1169 and lost to a 1550, I would not at all be surprised if the OP gave their rating as being anywhere in the range of ~950 to ~1650. 1250 falls well within that range. The two games told to us is not a sufficient data set to restrict the uncertainty much more than that.
Perhaps to help clarify Loomis' point. Given the information that the OP drew against a 1169 and lost to a 1550, I would not at all be surprised if the OP gave their rating as being anywhere in the range of ~950 to ~1650. 1250 falls well within that range. The two games told to us is not a sufficient data set to restrict the uncertainty much more than that.
I never said my rating is 1250 you stupid retard Anyways how could my rating be 1650 if i lost to a 1550 and drawed to a 1169 and ive played MORE THAN TWO GAMES you moron

I never said my rating is 1250 you stupid retard Anyways how could my rating be 1650 if i lost to a 1550 and drawed to a 1169 and ive played MORE THAN TWO GAMES you moron

I never said my rating is 1250 you stupid retard Anyways how could my rating be 1650 if i lost to a 1550 and drawed to a 1169 and ive played MORE THAN TWO GAMES you moron
I laughed until tears streamed. Luckily, I didn't wet my pants....too much anyway. What a great source for usenames..."Retard-Frog-Squirrel."
I already have enough difficulty taking things seriously. Thanks.
You ask a question about your rating, and give us a sample size of two games.
From my first response: It would be impossible to tell your rating from a sample size of two games. I would not be surprised at all to see a 1250 draw a game with an 1169 and lose to a 1550.
From my second response: trying to judge anything about your rating based on 2 games as you did in the above quote is not possible.
From my third response: the answer to your question is that you played a bunch of other games that determined your rating that you're not telling us about.
And most recently: How am I supposed to make any comment on what your rating should be on the basis of just the two games you told me about? I can't, no one can.
At one point in the last 6 months I won against a player rated 2050 and I drew with a player rated 2250. How can my rating be 1900?
I hope by now that this question sounds as stupid to you as your question is starting to sound to me.