Sacrificing material early on so the enemy cannot castle .
I'm a begginer chess player, and i was thinking how good of an idea is to sacrifice a knight or usually a bishop so the enemy is forced to take with the king or a rook, avoiding castling for his entire game. Good idea, terrible idea - your thoughts?
There is an old saying: "One piece attacks do not work."
After you "sacrifice" a piece for a pawn, what is your game plan on taking advantage of the opposing king not being able to castle?
Do you know the bishop's opening? The take of f7 on the second move is usually called a premature attack. Don't make such moves unless you have a great advantage in development, or have done enough calculation to lure the king out and form a mating net
Tactics flow from a superior position. FIRST you establish an advantageous position, THEN you start looking for sacrifices or other tactics.
The only opening I can think of where it's a remotely good idea is the Traxler. And it's a real gamble anyways.
I'm a begginer chess player, and i was thinking how good of an idea is to sacrifice a knight or usually a bishop so the enemy is forced to take with the king or a rook, avoiding castling for his entire game. Good idea, terrible idea - your thoughts?
If I were playing you and you did that my tactics would be to exchange pieces and get the Queens off the board. As the match quickly enters the endgame phase I want my King to be active, so the fact he never castled is a bonus. Oh, and I am up a piece !
I'm a begginer chess player, and i was thinking how good of an idea is to sacrifice a knight or usually a bishop so the enemy is forced to take with the king or a rook, avoiding castling for his entire game. Good idea, terrible idea - your thoughts?