Sceptical

Sort:
Kaqnn
Chess.com is best
Pills9262
Ok
Jamal_657

ok

TheMidnightExpress12

Erm what #20

RandomChessPlayer62
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:

Erm what #20

I have a supply of eye bleach if needed

WelshWren

Best of luck Jamal, I'm 61 and married

TheDice123456
RandomChessPlayer62 wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:

Erm what #20

I have a supply of eye bleach if needed

Please. I need some right now.

Martin_Stahl
wrote:

I don't understand the bit about 'depends on what community you play', As a newbie I just hit the 15/10 button for a rapid game. It doesn't make sense to me that a player rated below 1000 can seem to understand the first 6 or 7 moves against the Pirc, Caro-Kann defence or the Ruy Lopez or Vienna openings, almost perfectly without any inaccuracies. I'm not saying they don't make mistakes or blunders as the game progresses but don't all of us under an ELO of say 1800. I would think that both Chess.com and Lychess are determining our level based on how we play after a sufficient number of games, Surely they can't be hugely different. If they are, and we play on both websites, how are we meant to properly understand our estimated rating. Perhaps it's that I played so long on Lychess first. All a bit confusing.

You're under 1000 and understand the openings/positions but your opponents can't! 🤔

A lot of lower rated players study openings and can enter the middle game with no big errors. It's actually pretty common, even in OTB official rated chess. I had an opponent in a tournament, rated under 700 play an essentially even opening almost 20 moves deep, only messing up in a tactical position.

Pills9262

Hello

Aarohanegi123

Hiii

Aarohanegi123

Alll

Fetoxo
Lichess is way too inflated. Like i am 1800 on lichess.