setting with increment time

I know that is not against the international chess rules it's only in the online chess game however, for avoidance for the online user gamers for complaining. Thus, fair to all of us online user gamers avoid setting with an increment time and followed the actual international chess game, thank you!

Increments is an excellent time control, as it allows short time control endgames to be played out in full. If you don't like it, don't play using it.

Mr. Guolin,

Good day!

Playing with an incremented time is just like you played with no timer. Thus, it is better not utilize your timer or you not set the time so, you can analyze well.

Thanks,

ajulian1

chess.com user

ajulian,  when talking online chess, do you mean chess on Internet, or online chess as defined here (turn based, version of correspondence chess).

Using increment is completelly normal in OTB play, here it can be used in live chess. It saves people from pointless moves in order to win on time only, a 1 or 2 second is just enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_control

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_clock

From wikipedia:

Fischer's digital clock gave each player a fixed period of time at the start of the game and then added a small amount after each move. In this way, the players would never be desperately short of time, but games could also be completed more quickly, doing away with the need for adjournments (in which a game is left incomplete to be finished at a later date). Although it was slow to catch on, as of 2004 a very large number of top class tournaments use Fischer's system, though usually in combination with the more traditional clocks (at lower levels, more traditional clocks are still employed as they are cheaper).

The important thing is that we have a timer cause we have a specific time setting to finish the game (i.e., 10 minutes) you think we will finished the game in 10 minutes are you? probably over 10 minutes.

If you are desperate to finish the game in 10 minutes, then choose a time control without increment, that is all.

If you want to play such games, then please do, nothing stops you from choosing games with no increment.

I for example would probably played terribly in bullet chess, that's why I don't play it, but I don't advocate against it.  

That's what I mean, if you can't get it let's stop this argument, okay.

Actually this is only a suggestion but already made into an argument because of our different ideas, okay.

I asked for Dragec? It is necessary for him to have an increment time, he is automatically defeated if he don't have an incremented time, or what if the timer is an analog, what happened to him? Is he defeated, lose or something would happened?

It is not necessary for me to have an increment time, but my personal preference is irrelevant here, . But if it would, then it would be relevant for me, I wouldn't want it to became a rule for everyone.

I drink coffee with cream and sugar, but I don't think that everyone else have to enjoy  exactly the same "coffee setup".

It seems that you're having difficulty with that concept, its called live and let live. Pick your choice, and let the others to pick theirs.