Shameless Bullet Players 🤬 - Chess Forums - Page 66

chamo2074

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1301

EhmTae wrote:

Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?

Like I don't know how to express about what I feel about this comment

This is your last bullet game https://www.chess.com/game/live/12600514867?username=ehmtae

Decided by 0.2 seconds, how can your brain think a quick mouse makes no difference?

Anonymous_Dragon

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1302

EhmTae wrote:

Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?

Were you high on weed while typing this ?

Grimm_Stone

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1303

HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

.....................................

lol

Rodgy

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1304

Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

Says the person who has played over 2000 games of bullet.

GBTGBA

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1305

For people not knowing what to do in hyperbullet: you just need to defend. Someone has to attack someone has to defend. Don’t know how to attack ? No problem. Just defend.

Tails204

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1306

GBTGBA wrote:

For people not knowing what to do in hyperbullet: you just need to defend. Someone has to attack someone has to defend. Don’t know how to attack ? No problem. Just defend.

True! But I don't play Hyperbullet (except 4-player chess). My time control is 1+0.

Anonymous_Dragon

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1307

Roger436 wrote:

Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

Says the person who has played over 2000 games of bullet.

It's irrelevant

Kadenstarr

Apr 30, 2021

0

#1308

300 left

Anonymous_Dragon

May 1, 2021

0

#1309

My latest bullet win by 0.1 second.

https://www.chess.com/live#g=13627915367

EhmTae

May 1, 2021

0

#1310

Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

EhmTae wrote:

Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?

Were you high on weed while typing this ?

no, I had just misread the rating on my profile... so nevermind lol

modipaduollemmers

May 1, 2021

0

#1311

I think this is the forum with the most answers ever

AussieMatey

May 1, 2021

0

#1312

Definitely the most in the shortest amount of time. 10 days for 1736 posts equals nearly 9 pages per day.

Nennerb

May 1, 2021

0

#1313

AussieRookie wrote:

Definitely the most in the shortest amount of time. 10 days for 1736 posts equals nearly 9 pages per day.

Yes

Nennerb

May 1, 2021

0

#1314

1738

GBTGBA

May 1, 2021

0

#1315

If you like to attack, play the Lion Opening. I found out with Lions Opening I know automatically what to do. Not much thinking required. At my level and hyperbullet anyway.