lmao it’s bullet you sold your shame long ago for the rating points now your emotionless kinda like me but I sold my soul along with my shame
Bruh I didn't understand anything
lmao it’s bullet you sold your shame long ago for the rating points now your emotionless kinda like me but I sold my soul along with my shame
Bruh I didn't understand anything
lmao it’s bullet you sold your shame long ago for the rating points now your emotionless kinda like me but I sold my soul along with my shame
the what now
Don't just tell that to kids, tell that to the adults as well.
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?
Like I don't know how to express about what I feel about this comment
This is your last bullet game https://www.chess.com/game/live/12600514867?username=ehmtae
Decided by 0.2 seconds, how can your brain think a quick mouse makes no difference?
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?
Were you high on weed while typing this ?
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
Says the person who has played over 2000 games of bullet.
For people not knowing what to do in hyperbullet: you just need to defend. Someone has to attack someone has to defend. Don’t know how to attack ? No problem. Just defend.
True! But I don't play Hyperbullet (except 4-player chess). My time control is 1+0.
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
Says the person who has played over 2000 games of bullet.
It's irrelevant
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?
Were you high on weed while typing this ?
no, I had just misread the rating on my profile... so nevermind lol
Definitely the most in the shortest amount of time. 10 days for 1736 posts equals nearly 9 pages per day.
My bullet is rating is 7000 rating points above my actual playing strength.
Lol same!