Should cheat accusation spam be tolerate ?

I find irritating to be publicly accused from cheating, specially since the accusation come from a titled member and leader or a 1000 member guild. Also i don't understand that accusation since tactical is not my best skill in chess, maybe someone can take a quick look on my two games and explain me?

http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match?id=478566

Maybe i should ignore this and get over it but, no.  I think public cheat accusations should be taken seriously because it can affect a reputation. I took a look on my opponents current and past games and found that i am not alone to be annoyed by this.

http://www.chess.com/tournament/the-swashbuckling-evans-gambit

http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match?id=514856

http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match?id=443918

http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match?id=509396

few more

http://www.chess.com/groups/team_match?id=454562

http://www.chess.com/tournament/open-catalan-2014

And i don't understand why chess.com did not take the time to answer me about this when i asked help, but maybe it's my mistake and i deleted the message before i read it ?

I wouldn't pay any attention to it.

I do agree that she should be strongly discouraged from saying such things but the fact that she accuses everyone makes it seem like she's a bad loser.

Next time, don't delete emails coming from staff.

I would resubmit it.

thanks notmtwain, but i can hardly believe a titled member would volontary make fake accusation of cheating just because of being a bad loser. Sill looking for someone who can look the two games an give opinion please.

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=101942525

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=101942523

who cares i Laugh it off and take it as a compliment

You would think that a title would make the person less likely to risk their position but I have seen another titled player thrown off Chess.com for making abusive remarks 

Just because somebody is pretty good at chess doesn't mean they're smart or mature. I looked at the first game and it was unremarkable in every way.

You have a point, i probably overrate my opponent because titled. And yes it sounded like a non-sense to me being accused cheating in those games, but i like to have opinions since i am unfamiliar with computer cheat / detect cheat, etc... ty

Anyone who declares that they have proof that an engine is being used in a correspondence game has just offered proof that they themselves are using an engine.

I assumed that it is authorized to use engines to track cheaters, maybe i am wrong ?

Not much of a concern for those games since my opponent played quite under his rate comparing to other 2100+ i meet yet.