similarities between mikhail tal and martin stahl

tal was an excellent chess player, but his key advantage was his ability to gake risks. He could envision a peice a million squares into the future, and place that peice on such a square that that sequence would play out the way it ought to. 

was that foresight? Hardly. it was the ability to control the other peices on the board, through one peice.

a bit like how martin stahl controls chess.com through colby covington, to quote one example. 

but moving on, how could mikhail do that?

its because he understood the connectivity between chess peices. i.e he had a very deep tactical understanding. How for example is a knight connected to a bishop in one position or the other? the positional tactical and so forth parerphenelia unique to that position come into play. 

So tal proved that the positional value per position, as opposed to the totality of the positional value of the chess game, was important. 

for example

totality of positional value: stuff like open files, pawn chains etc

positional value per position: the correlation between the peices. How does the bishop complement the knight? How does the rook's position affect the pawns position?

that is surely a novelty in chess, a term called 'the correlation between chess peices per position' 

anybody have any ideas on the above?

Ummm, what?

i always thought u was the guy behind covingtons incessant trolling, or as a few oddities would suggest, controlling the masses with the iron fist of totalitarian theocracy. eradicate toxicity and what not was a good ploy to keep the masses in line, like saddaam hussein did, but thats just my opinion. subject to debate. but werent you the guy behind covington? behind every colbert is a martin, and so forth

@martin_stahl 's daily rating is currently 1904. Mikhail Tal once had a 1904 ELO too!

You aren’t allowed to speak of Martin stahl on open forum , you’ll have to be redirected to the Martin stahl chat room…. Martin stahl —chess.com