sore losers

i really dont like when i get matched with higher level players that barely beat me and deny me a rematch and run etc if your playing someone new after 2 days and they can beat you and your a level 1000 than you should give the person a chance might have been a fluke you beat them lol just saying

But they still beat you. Right?

It has nothing to do with running away.
There can be a thousand reasons not to accept a rematch, but what do I expect from a guy that says 'lol just saying'.

I beat someone and they accused me of clock cheating.

do you win by brain or clock cheating

by crishna 25 hours ago

So I responded thusly:

Hi Crishna, you are right. I win mostly by clock cheating. I invented a black hole system whereby I can time travel ahead and see what moves you will make, and then I prepare and crush you like the bug you are.

by PDubya 6 hours ago

Don't make fun of clock cheating, it's an ancient tradition practiced only by those who are worhty of it.

What is clock,cheating? Do you clock someone so they are knocked out?

If you contentrate hardly enough, you can use your hidden, inner telekinetic power to stop your clock from counting whenever you want.
Not advised to used in OTB, thought, the pieces can fly all around the place if you mess something up. 

Black magic potions required!

clock cheating sounds like sour grapes

That not always will work:

- Pablo is a normal guy, except for he's able to see 30 min. into the future.

- "WCC. Pablo vs. Kasparov".

- "Start!"

- "Your sister's pu**y, Kasparov!"

I didn't understand it. Lol anyways.

If ppl don't give you a rematch it's because you're doing it wrong.

You need to let them know it's not a humble request, but a demand.

Stomp your foot, and cry in a childish voice: "I want I want I WAAAAAAANT!!!!!"

That should help.

Since he's able to look 30 min into the future, he realizes he's lost almost immediately (notice the clock on the wall).

So he didn't play coz he'll lose it anyhow?

He saw the position after 30 min playing. You can imagine what a mess it was, since he was playing Kasparov.

I only play max 5 min. Blitz games at "Play live chess" - it is too easy to use engine evaluation at 10 min. and above games. I have met quite a lot of "too good to be true" -computer style <1000 rated players. 

Cheating used be better monitored at chess.com 

No offense, but at your level, how can you tell that it's a computer, and not just someone that memorised a branch of openings and plays them well?
It's ridiculous to think of cheating at that low level we're on.

no actually i have won plenty in fact i just started learning chess a few days ago i always knew the positions they moved etc but not positional play opening defenses or gambits etc and yes i beat a person at 1000 while i was around 700 and plenty others if the people im talking about read this theyll know who they are and its kind of funny someone like you facepalm would talk some smack some of you people have such an elevated sense of self worth its actually funny why dont we play sometime smart  a*** lol