Speed Chess Challenge

Sort:
Avatar of Zidanefre

llama the alekhine destroyer :eyes:

Avatar of Zidanefre

as a lifelong alekhine adherent myself I'm not sure how to view this, heh.

Avatar of llama47

This one 2100 OTB player told me once that in his OTB games, a certain opening made him uncomfortable, and he always got a bad position... but also he usually won in the end, so there was no reason to stop playing it.

Sure 9...e5 isn't your favorite. And maybe something like 5...exd isn't your favorite either... but for a specific opponent if you score better that way, why not grin.png

Avatar of llama47

Draw with black, win with white. GM strategy haha.

Avatar of Zidanefre
llama47 hat geschrieben:

Draw with black, win with white. GM strategy haha.

everybody gangsta until you get matched with an underrated opponent and you're black

Avatar of Zidanefre
Steven-ODonoghue hat geschrieben:
llama47 wrote:

This one 2100 OTB player told me once that in his OTB games, a certain opening made him uncomfortable, and he always got a bad position... but also he usually won in the end, so there was no reason to stop playing it.

Sure 9...e5 isn't your favorite. And maybe something like 5...exd isn't your favorite either... but for a specific opponent if you score better that way, why not

Yeah, I suppose so. I kept hoping you would play something like 4.Nf3 since I went with the move order 3...Nb6 instead of 3...d6. But you kept torturing me with 4.c4

perhaps you've considered switching to exd over cxd? :T

Avatar of llama47

Oh yeah, 4.Nf3. Not a terrible position, I considered it, but I felt like you'd be comfortable. The positions are similar to something I like to play as black, and that was just my feeling, that you'd like it. 4.c4 transposed into my main prep, so I stuck with that.

Avatar of Zidanefre

I actually score better with cxd overall, but I'm not liking the lines where I play e5 and they respond with d5 (I've lost all games)

I'll stick with my mediocre exd lol

Avatar of llama47

That's a benefit of arranged games like this... makes us study stuff.

When I was playing at a club, every week I'd prepare something or study something I did badly last time.

If you only ever play random people you never get that motivation.

Avatar of Zidanefre
llama47 hat geschrieben:

That's a benefit of arranged games like this... makes us study stuff.

When I was playing at a club, every week I'd prepare something or study something I did badly last time.

If you only ever play random people you never get that motivation.

no wonder my opening repertoire is almost exactly the same depth as it was when I was 1500...

Avatar of llama47

Haha happy.png

Avatar of Zidanefre

Steven... my tactics haven't improved at all. The only thing I think I got better at is pawn structures, but there's a limit to how much you can autopilot your way through classical games. 

When I start calculating a position for more than two minutes I get frustrated and impatient and then I just make a move "so the game can continue"

Meaning I finish all my games with wayy too much time left on the clock :L

Avatar of llama47

Nah, your tactics are good.

We both made mistakes, but I think you were more often the one punishing me tactically.

Avatar of llama47
B1ZMARK wrote:

Steven... my tactics haven't improved at all. The only thing I think I got better at is pawn structures, but there's a limit to how much you can autopilot your way through classical games. 

When I start calculating a position for more than two minutes I get frustrated and impatient and then I just make a move "so the game can continue"

Meaning I finish all my games with wayy too much time left on the clock :L

I think I have a trick for this (I played tons of online and took long breaks between OTB so I know the feeling of not being able to manage a clock).

Do something like untimed puzzle rush, or buy a puzzle book... the point is you're going to get hard puzzles.

And then set a clock for yourself... your target time (and time limit) is whatever you want your normal pace of OTB games to be. That way you'll get used to how you should fill up that time (how long to look for candidates, how long to calculate a single line, when to wrap things up, when to make a final decision).

Avatar of llama47
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Nah, your tactics are good.

We both made mistakes, but I think you were more often the one punishing me tactically.

I think my tactics are fine, just that they haven't improved (much) since I was about 1500. I even got my all time high PR score back when I was 1350 in blitz

That's nuts lol.

Avatar of Zidanefre

hmmm maybe it's time to buy Yusurpov then

Avatar of llama47

And if the puzzles are too hard, that's good, because you wont have a solution yet. Just pretend it's a normal game, you tried to find a tactic, didn't, and now you're going to make a normal move.

Avatar of Zidanefre
llama47 hat geschrieben:
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Nah, your tactics are good.

We both made mistakes, but I think you were more often the one punishing me tactically.

I think my tactics are fine, just that they haven't improved (much) since I was about 1500. I even got my all time high PR score back when I was 1350 in blitz

That's nuts lol.

I got my PR highscore of 47 when i was around 1600-1800 blitz range (can't remember)

I broke it recently with... 48. This was like two weeks ago.

Avatar of llama47

I was 1800 blitz... at least 10 years ago lol. Puzzle Rush didn't exist, so I guess I have no way of knowing whether that's normal or something.

Avatar of llama47
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:

I'm the opposite - my tactics and endgames are almost exactly the same as when I was 1500, all my study is mostly on openings

Hmm

Then maybe an anti Steven match strat is freestyling the openings to get odd positions.