Mate in 5:
STALEMATE ANSWER
Sort:
dont uderstand this comment since i already agreed lol
for all the poeple still tryin to make an argument i was just looking for a good argument agaisnt my idea which from a few people i got a good argument agaisnt it that i do agree with so i dont know why people are still arguing unless there bored and whant somone to listen to them
Come on. "In real life situation, this would not happen" ?
In real life situtation, you are often faced with one opponent, with 31 underlings for each in an approximatively equal battle ?
You would make moves in turn ?
What is the equivalent of "promotion", in the sense of a perfectly well-planned transformation of pieces, in real life ?
Chess is a game, not a deep philosophical reflect of life.
Jun 4, 2013
0
#26
grunt14 wrote:
i know that this is a heated topic but the answer seems very simple. all you need to do is add an additional rule. chess has been around for over a thousand years and in that time period rules have been added, that's a fact. just say that a king cannot move into check with the exception that if the king is the only available piece to move and all it can do is move into check then that king would be captured. this would not change game play at all especially compared to castling and others. all this would change would be that very end moment of the game. if the idea is to capture the opponents king then this is much more logical rule.
let me know what you thank. dont care if it stays or goes, this just makes alot more sense to me
I think thats a great idea! I've had a games where I was a Queen ahead and instead of resigning like a gentleman, my ungracious opponent tricked me into stalemating him!
good comment definitely true