Stalemate sucks and it needs to be removed

Sort:
Avatar of falcon39

nahh this requires very specific positions and its very rare that it actually occurs.

Avatar of ItsTwoDuece
Serene_Sameer wrote:
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN STALE MATE IS REMOVED FROM CHESS.COM I HATE STALEMATE BEING REMOVED FROM CHESS.COM I COULDNT EVEN MOVE ANYWHERE BUT CAUSE OF CHESS.COM REMOVAL OF STALEMATE I FLIPING LOST BY TIME PLS ADD IT BACK and im black HAPPENED ON C7 LAST MOVE OFC

Bro you could have moved the rook... stalemate hasn't been removed...

Avatar of jetoba
ItsTwoDuece wrote:
Serene_Sameer wrote:
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN STALE MATE IS REMOVED FROM CHESS.COM I HATE STALEMATE BEING REMOVED FROM CHESS.COM I COULDNT EVEN MOVE ANYWHERE BUT CAUSE OF CHESS.COM REMOVAL OF STALEMATE I FLIPING LOST BY TIME PLS ADD IT BACK and im black HAPPENED ON C7 LAST MOVE OFC

Bro you could have moved the rook... stalemate hasn't been removed...

Some people say that if the king cannot move and is not in check then it is stalemate regardless of whether or not there are other pieces that can move. You can explain the rule, emphasize the ability of other pieces to move, and show the rule in the rulebook, and they will still argue that your interpretation of the rule is wrong.

Then you set the board up in the initial position and ask if it is stalemate because the king cannot move. So far that has always worked for an explanation.

Avatar of ChessAchiver235
jetoba wrote:
ItsTwoDuece wrote:
Serene_Sameer wrote:
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN STALE MATE IS REMOVED FROM CHESS.COM I HATE STALEMATE BEING REMOVED FROM CHESS.COM I COULDNT EVEN MOVE ANYWHERE BUT CAUSE OF CHESS.COM REMOVAL OF STALEMATE I FLIPING LOST BY TIME PLS ADD IT BACK and im black HAPPENED ON C7 LAST MOVE OFC

Bro you could have moved the rook... stalemate hasn't been removed...

Some people say that if the king cannot move and is not in check then it is stalemate regardless of whether or not there are other pieces that can move. You can explain the rule, emphasize the ability of other pieces to move, and show the rule in the rulebook, and they will still argue that your interpretation of the rule is wrong.

Then you set the board up in the initial position and ask if it is stalemate because the king cannot move. So far that has always worked for an explanation.

sure this is a massive quote but improvement people just think plus it shows a dual blade if you really think about it

Avatar of Abtectous
Get good
Avatar of Abtectous
#150, THATS SO COOL! I wish it worked out for him.
Avatar of bourbourla

im on both sides, its annoying but u have to be careful

Avatar of JustBramz

I know I’m late to the party but sheesh. Chess rules have been set in stone for 1500 years. It’s not gonna be chess.com that changes this.

changing this basic rule changes 1500 years of history.